Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is argued that clean water is the fundamental right of every human being, so every household should be provided with it without cost. while free water has an economic benefit for people, I largely disagree on its free supply, As it will lead to burden on the government budget as well as on the resources.

In order to provide clean water, it must pass through the complex processes of the filteration. Additionally, running sewage systems requires the heavy machineries, tranport lines, technicians, engineers and the other staff for supervision, this could only be managed with sufficient finances.

If water supply became free, it would be difficult for the government to continue its free provision while bearing the heavy budget solely on itself. Moreover, no charges on water will lead people to its uncontrolled usage, and finally causing waste to this vital resource. In my country, as government has set no limits and the cost on extra water usage, people there forget to close their water taps and consumes it ruthlessly in the agricultural activities. Thereby, some cost over water is an absoulte necessity that will ultimately lead to help the goverment in managing its budget along with making people more responsible in its usage.

Admittedly, free water will financially benefit everyone, however some of this benefit could still be retained by charging less for certain limited usage and more on extra usage, whereas the potential of harm this costless approach holds for our state finances and water resources can never be reversed with any other alternatives.

In conclusion, although chargeless access to water has economic signifance for public, It should never be provided for free, because it can lead to the challenges of finantial strains and water resource depletion for government and poeple.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction—“I largely disagree”—and remains consistent in the conclusion. You address the central issue by explaining that water treatment and distribution require funding, and that charging for excess use may discourage waste. The example about people leaving taps open and using water in agriculture helps make the resource argument relevant. This is a well-focused response with ideas extended and supported. To strengthen it further, develop the counterargument more fully: you acknowledge that free water would benefit people financially, but do not explain who would be most affected by charges or how a basic affordable allowance could protect access as a human right. Some claims, such as the irreversibility of the harm, are also asserted rather than demonstrated.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear overall progression: you state your view, explain the costs of supplying water, discuss overuse, acknowledge a benefit of free provision, and conclude by restating your position. Paragraphing supports this structure, and linking expressions such as “Moreover,” “Admittedly,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. Some connections are less smooth, however. The long second body paragraph combines infrastructure costs, government finances, overuse, and the country example, so separating these points could make the reasoning easier to track. The sentence beginning “Thereby” also makes the relationship between charging and responsible use feel abrupt. Use referencing and transitions that clarify how each example supports the specific claim.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “fundamental right,” “sewage systems,” “water resources,” and “financially benefit.” These choices allow you to discuss both infrastructure and conservation, and the meaning is generally clear. You also attempt more formal expressions, but some are inaccurate or unnatural: “filteration,” “heavy machineries,” “cost over water,” and “chargeless access” do not fit standard usage. Spelling errors such as “tranport,” “absoulte,” and “finantial” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise, natural collocations rather than more elaborate wording—for example, refer to water treatment, costly equipment, water charges, and free access. Proofreading for spelling and word forms would make your vocabulary more effective.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including conditional reasoning (“If water supply became free…”) and a concession beginning “although.” The main argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors recur and occasionally make relationships between ideas less clear. For example, “people … forget to close their water taps and consumes it” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “this could only be managed” has an unclear reference. The opening also has faulty sentence boundaries and capitalization: “while free water … . while” and “disagree …, As.” Review agreement, articles, and punctuation, and check that pronouns clearly refer to the intended noun. Breaking long sentences into controlled clauses will help you retain complexity while improving accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.