Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Water is plays an important role in our daily lives, such as cooking,washing and cleaning. Therefore every household should be provided with a free supply of water because access of safe drinking water is our essential right. I completely agree with this statement because water is necessary for a healthy life survival. Firstly,clean water is fundamental for human health.People need safe drinking water to stay healthy and prevent different diseases.If people do not have access to clean water, they may suffer from serious health problems. For example,in some rural areas,people use dirty water from ponds and rivers ,which can cause serious stomach infections and other health problems. Secondly, free water supply can help poor families financially. Many people cannot afford to pay high water bills because of their low income. If the government delivers basic water facilities free of charge ,these families can easily meet their daily water needs . Moreover, children and elderly people can also benefit from a clean and safe water supply. In conclusion,I strongly agree that every residence should have access to free water services because it is crucial for good health and a better quality of life. The government should take responsibilities for providing this basic facility to everyone.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction—“I completely agree”—and the response gives relevant reasons concerning health and the financial burden on low-income families. The example of people using polluted water from ponds and rivers also supports the health argument. However, the two main points are only briefly explained, and the financial argument would benefit from a specific example or further explanation of how free provision could be funded or limited to essential household use. The response also does not meet the stated 250-word minimum, which restricts how fully you can develop the ideas. To strengthen the answer, extend each reason with a concrete example and address the practical implications of providing water free of charge.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, two body paragraphs signposted by “Firstly” and “Secondly,” and a conclusion that restates your position. This makes the progression easy to follow, and the health and affordability points are separated appropriately. The linking is sometimes mechanical, however, because the paragraphs rely mainly on basic sequence markers and repeated references to water and families. Some connections could be made more explicit—for instance, explain how the example of rural water relates to the need for a publicly provided supply. Use a wider range of natural transitions and clearer referencing, while keeping the straightforward paragraph structure that already works.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “safe drinking water,” “water bills,” “low income,” and “stomach infections,” so the main ideas are communicated clearly. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “free of charge” and “quality of life.” Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, including “access of safe drinking water,” “healthy life survival,” and “basic water facilities.” These do not prevent understanding, but they reduce precision and naturalness. Aim to learn common combinations such as “access to clean water,” “essential for survival,” and “water infrastructure,” and check spacing and punctuation around words as part of proofreading.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple statements and more complex sentences, including conditional structures such as “If people do not have access to clean water, they may suffer…” and “If the government delivers… these families can…”. Most sentences communicate their meaning, but some grammatical errors remain. The opening, “Water is plays,” contains an unnecessary verb, while “every residence should have access” does not match the intended meaning as naturally as referring to every household. There are also punctuation and spacing problems, such as missing spaces after commas and inconsistent comma placement. Review verb forms and sentence punctuation, then proofread each sentence for a single correctly formed main verb.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.