Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In my opinion, the supply of clean water shoud be free of charge for every home. Clean water is necessory for good health however, there is no delivery of clean water at every part of the country. For instance, look around the rural areas, they drink simple water on daily basis.

To began with, clean water is a big need for every human being but some families who can not support to buy clean water, they drink normal water and fulfill their needs which is not good for their health. If the supply of clean water will be free so they may also use clean water and a number of diseases will not occur.

Moreover, the supply of filtered water may be costly for Government. To solve that problem, they can make water filter plant at every villages so every human being can use filtered water. Nowadays, there are few water filtration plant in cities and also in rural areas. It is very far for many families. Therefore the Government may have to make few more water plants at every villages which make the sypply of clean water almost all over the country.

In conclusion, the supply of clean water should have to be free of charge. As i mantioned earlier, clean water is daily need and also good for healthy life. We can provide filtered water all over the country by making water filteration plant at the every villages and town. So the peoples can fill tank by clean water and may use for drink and other purposes.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the opening: you agree that clean water should be free for every home, and the conclusion restates this view. You give relevant reasons, especially that families unable to pay may rely on unsafe water and face health risks. You also recognise the cost to government and suggest building filtration plants, which addresses a practical concern. However, some points are not fully explained: “a number of diseases will not occur” needs a clearer link to access to treated water, and the proposal to build plants in every village is asserted without explaining how this would make household supply free. Develop these points with a specific example or explanation of funding and delivery.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting health and infrastructure points, and a conclusion. Linking expressions such as “To begin with,” “Moreover,” “Therefore,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the main stages. The progression is generally logical, moving from the need for clean water to a possible way of providing it. However, some connections are mechanical, and the relationship between free household water and building filtration plants is not fully made explicit. References such as “that problem” are also somewhat vague. Use transitions that show the precise relationship between ideas, and make each paragraph develop one central point through explanation and an example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “clean water,” “filtered water,” “water filtration plant,” and “diseases.” However, the range is limited and several choices or forms are inaccurate, which sometimes makes the writing less natural. For example, “simple water” and “normal water” are unclear in this context; “untreated water” would be more precise. “Big need” is informal and imprecise, while “daily need” and “good for healthy life” are awkward collocations. Spelling errors such as “shoud,” “necessory,” and “sypply” are also noticeable. Build a more precise vocabulary for water access and public services, and check spelling and collocations during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including conditional structures such as “If the supply of clean water will be free so they may also use clean water” and a relative clause in “families who can not support to buy clean water.” These attempts show some range, but the conditional form is faulty, and several sentences contain errors in agreement, articles, plurals, or sentence construction. For example, “at every villages” should use a singular noun after “every,” and “the supply … should have to be free” combines two modal patterns incorrectly. Punctuation also needs attention, as in “necessary for good health however.” Practise accurate conditionals and modal verbs, and proofread sentence boundaries and agreement.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.