Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Yes I partially agree that access to clean water is a basic human right for everyone, so everyone should have access to clean water with out any charges.

Water is an important element for surviving. Because clean water is used for drinking , cleaning, cooking etc. Access to clean water helps prevents water born diseases. Dirty or unfiltered water causes diseases such as diarrhoea , cholera.

People with poor background struggles to buy basic necessities, so its already hard for them to pay water bills. So, by removing this their financial burden may decrease and they can spend or buy more foods and other necessities.

Moreover, if everyone had to pay for clean water , people with rich background have more access to water, which will create unfair distribute of natural resources.

Furthermore, if everyone gains access to free clean water , it will also improve public health as majority of water infected diseases won't spread.

However there may also be some problems that may arise, because if governments have to spend a huge budget to build the necessary infrastructure

to provide free clean water and they have to spend more to maintain this infrastructures. For this reason they have to cut budgets in other sectors. Which will cause a negative impact. Furthermore, there will be a high chances of water wastages. Also if waters are not distributed properly there will also be water shortages.

In the end , even if its true that water should be accessed by everyone there should be strong rules and regulations for it , so it will be fair if there is a system that make sure everyone gets frees access to clean drinkable water and charges will be applied for those who use water in their household or wok place.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is partly supportive of free access, while recognising that universal provision could create costs and waste. You address both sides with relevant points: clean water can prevent diseases such as cholera, and free provision could ease pressure on poorer households; you also mention infrastructure costs and possible shortages. This covers the task, but some ideas are asserted rather than explained. For example, the claim that richer people would gain more access if water had to be paid for needs a clearer link to how pricing affects distribution. Your conclusion is also difficult to reconcile with your opening: it proposes charging for household or workplace use, without clarifying what access should remain free. State precisely whether a basic amount should be free and develop that policy consistently.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: it introduces a position, presents supporting reasons, considers drawbacks, and ends with a conclusion. Paragraphing helps distinguish the main points, and transitions such as “Moreover,” “Furthermore,” and “However” guide the reader through the argument. At times, however, the links feel mechanical, and some ideas are repeated: public-health benefits appear in both the second and fourth paragraphs. The final paragraph also shifts from supporting free access to proposing charges, so the progression of your position is not fully clear. Group related points more tightly, use references such as “this policy” to connect explanations, and make the conclusion follow directly from the position established in the introduction.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main argument, including “basic necessities,” “financial burden,” “infrastructure,” and “water shortages.” These choices show an attempt to discuss social and practical consequences rather than relying only on very general language. However, several word-choice, collocation, and spelling errors reduce precision, including “water born diseases,” “unfair distribute,” “water infected diseases,” and “frees access.” Some expressions are also vague or repetitive, such as “rich background” and “poor background.” Aim for accurate topic-specific phrases and check word forms and spelling. More precise language would help distinguish free access to a basic supply from unlimited household use.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including conditional structures such as “if everyone had to pay” and a longer sentence explaining government costs. The main meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “People with poor background struggles” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “helps prevents” uses an incorrect verb form. Sentence boundaries are also sometimes faulty: “Which will cause a negative impact” is a fragment, and the opening “Because clean water is used…” is not a complete sentence. Review agreement, verb patterns, articles, and punctuation, and connect dependent clauses to complete sentences. This will make your argument easier to follow without changing its ideas.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.