Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

I strongly believe that access to clean water is a basic human right. Millions of people suffering in places where clean water is scarce, as water helps people perform everyday tasks like bathing, washing clothes, cooking, cleaning, etc. Even with the abundance of water on earth, barely 5 percent of water is actually available for use.

It is essential for every human to get access to clean water as it is the basis for survival, and every house must have a water supply provided free of charge. It should not be treated as a product on the market to be sold and must be provided sufficiently to the society. I travel to India every year, to meet family, and when I do, I feel devastated when I see people living in poor conditions, barely scraping by due to the absence of clean water. They wait long lines at dawn at the local water tank to get a meagre quantity for the entire day. These people suffer from diseases like typhoid, and cholera due to the use of unclean water and are suffering everyday due to the government failing to provide clean water to the society. These diseases are life threatening and the death toll increases, simply because of the absence of clean water.

It is essential that everyone must receive clean water, whether rich or poor. The government should launch awareness campaigns to be mindful of the use of water and take steps to make the access of clean water a basic right for all humans.

In conclusion, clean water must be accessible everywhere and to any human, as it is a basic means of survival, and every human being has the right to life.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear throughout: you strongly agree that clean water is a basic right and should be supplied without charge. You support this with relevant reasons about survival and disease, and the account of people queuing for water in India gives the argument a concrete example. This fully addresses the central question. However, the discussion of free provision is asserted more than explained: for instance, “It should not be treated as a product on the market” would be stronger with a reason or a practical illustration. The final paragraph introduces awareness campaigns, but does not explain how these would ensure free household supply. Developing these points and extending the reasoning behind your example would make the response more complete and persuasive.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: it introduces your view, develops it through reasons and a personal example, and ends with a conclusion. Paragraphing helps distinguish the main stages of the argument, and links such as “Even with” and “In conclusion” guide the reader. At times, however, connections between ideas are abrupt or repetitive. The move from water scarcity to the claim that household supply should be free is not fully explained, and the final paragraph repeats the right-to-life point without adding much progression. Some references, such as “these people,” are understandable but could be tied more precisely to the preceding details. Use clearer cause-and-effect links and make each paragraph advance a distinct part of your case.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including relevant terms such as “scarce,” “survival,” “life threatening,” and “death toll.” The personal example also gives you opportunities to use specific language about water access and health. Some choices are imprecise or unnatural, however, such as “scraping by due to the absence of clean water” and “make the access of clean water a basic right.” There is also repetition of “clean water,” “essential,” and “every human,” which limits flexibility. Aim for more precise collocations and vary repeated expressions—for example, refer to “safe drinking water” or “reliable household access” where appropriate. This would make the argument sound more controlled and natural.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a subordinate clause in “when I do, I feel devastated” and a relative clause in “people living in poor conditions.” Most meaning remains clear, but some grammatical errors occur. The opening sentence fragment, “Millions of people suffering in places where clean water is scarce,” needs a finite verb, such as “Millions of people suffer.” In “They wait long lines,” the article and preposition pattern should be “They wait in long lines.” The sentence beginning “These people suffer from diseases” also needs more careful punctuation around the disease names, and “everyday” should be separated when used to mean “each day.” Greater accuracy in these patterns, alongside varied sentence structures, would strengthen control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.