Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In recent years there was a considerable debate on pure water. Consuming water has considered as universal right for human beings. Consequently, water should be supplied to every home without any charge. I'm completely agree with this statement.

To begin with, one of the main reason is if someone has not enough money so it will not able to drink water. Due to humanity water supply is a first right that everyone have in equal portion. While taking charge on basic human needs is a shame for all human kind. For instance, the people living in Africa had a large number of dead population due to water purification money almost 60% of their citizens were facing this issue. As a result, there young generation is accounted as the least population in the world.

On the other hand, there are several reasons why filter water is essential for living things. Every field of live and source of food require water. For example, crops need water to grow and produce vegetables, fruits and other source of food. Consequently, buying water cause major in society. Due to water scarcity, people may fight over limited water resources, which can eventually lead to social conflicts and serious disputes. Governments should create a pipeline to every single house of the country and supply detox water in equal amount for drinking and for maintaining our ecosystem.

In conclusion, I strongly believe in this idea. Since 70 percentage of our society did not afford any resource even a glass of water. Although it would be free for everyone.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction (“I’m completely agree”) and conclusion: you support free household water. You give relevant reasons, including affordability, access to a basic need, and the importance of water for crops and food production. The example about people in Africa also attempts to support your argument, although its figures and connection to the claim are unclear, so it is not convincing evidence. The discussion of scarcity and conflict is relevant, but the essay does not fully explain how free household supply would address these problems or how the service could be funded and managed. Develop each main reason with clearer explanation and a specific, credible example to make the response more complete and persuasive.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphs generally group related points, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the broad direction. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear. The Africa example moves abruptly from water costs to population claims, while the second body paragraph shifts from crops to social conflict and then government pipelines without fully connecting these points. Some linking expressions, including repeated “Consequently” and “Due to,” feel mechanical or do not express the relationship precisely. Use clearer topic sentences and explain the link between each example and its main point; also make references such as “this issue” more specific.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “water scarcity,” “limited water resources,” “social conflicts,” and “ecosystem,” which helps communicate the subject. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate or unnatural choices make parts of the argument difficult to interpret. For example, “pure water” and “filter water” are not the most natural terms here; “clean drinking water” would be clearer. “Detox water” does not convey the intended meaning of safe water, and “buying water cause major in society” is unclear. There are also word-form and spelling problems, such as “human kind” and “live” where “humanity” and “life” are intended. Build a more precise set of collocations for water access, affordability, and public provision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, using structures such as “if someone has not enough money” and “which can eventually lead to social conflicts.” This shows an effort to express conditions and consequences, but control is inconsistent, and errors sometimes make meaning harder to follow. Examples include “Consuming water has considered” (missing an auxiliary and incorrect verb form), “I’m completely agree” (incorrect verb pattern), and “everyone have” (subject–verb agreement). The sentence beginning “Although it would be free for everyone” is incomplete, and “one of the main reason” has a number-agreement error. Practise accurate basic sentence patterns first, then check verb forms, agreement, articles, and whether each sentence is complete.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.