Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Everyone should have access to clean water as it is a necessary human right along with that every household should have free supply of water.I strongly agree with this view as getting clean water is necessity and fundamental right of people

In every country getting clean and drinkable water is fundamental right of people.As, not getting clean water can lead to health problems. Drinking water that is not in good condition can increase the chances of getting sick along with various health problems like stmoach upset and kidney issue.For instace, in the few countries of africa there is no supply of clean water and they mostly water that is not drinkable and it led them to vaious problems.

After that, not getting access to the supply of clean water also contributes to hunger and the scarcity of food and the environmental factors. However, not getting suppy of water takes people to starve and being hungry for long time as they cannot cook food without water.Moreover, they are not able to grow crops and vegetables if supply of water is not there. For instance, in some of the rural areas there is no supply of water that leads to scarcity of land and land degradation that eventually leads to no vegetation. that directly effects hunger of individuals along with various environmental issues that hits the whole economy.

In conclusion, access to drinkable water is everyones right and every household should have free supply of water. Also, i completely agree with this view as it is necessity to have water supply not a luxury to have.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction and conclusion: you strongly agree that households should receive clean water free of charge. You give relevant reasons, especially the health risks of unsafe water and its effects on food production, and you include examples involving African countries and rural areas. This addresses the task, but some points are not fully explained. For example, the claim that water access is a human right is repeated rather than supported, and the link between free household supply and reducing hunger or environmental damage could be made more explicit. Develop each reason with a clearer explanation or a specific, credible example, and distinguish access to water from whether it should be free of charge.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting reasons, and a conclusion. The main ideas are generally grouped appropriately, and phrases such as “For instance” help signal examples. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow, and some links feel mechanical or unclear. “After that” does not accurately introduce the second reason, while “Moreover” and “However” do not always express the intended relationship. The sentence beginning “After that” also combines hunger, food scarcity, and environmental effects without a clear sequence. Use topic sentences that state one main point, then explain its cause and consequence, and choose linking expressions according to the precise relationship between ideas.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “fundamental right,” “health problems,” “scarcity,” and “land degradation,” so the reader can understand your main arguments. There are also attempts to use more specific terms, such as “drinkable water” and “vegetation.” However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation, and spelling errors reduce precision: “getting clean water,” “kidney issue,” “scarcity of land,” and “effects hunger” are not natural or accurate in context. Spelling slips such as “stmoach,” “instace,” and “vaious” also stand out. Build a bank of topic-specific collocations and check spelling; more precise phrasing will make your explanations clearer and more convincing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including cause-and-effect structures with “as,” “if,” and “that,” and your overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, sentence boundaries and punctuation are not consistently controlled. The opening runs two clauses together (“…human right along with that every household…”), and the sentence beginning “For instance” contains an unclear construction and shifts into “it led them” without a clear grammatical reference. There are also errors with articles, agreement, and sentence openings, as in “is necessity,” “it is everyones right,” and the lower-case “that” after a full stop. Practise separating complete ideas into sentences, then check articles, possessives, and subject–verb agreement. Greater control of these patterns would make your complex sentences easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.