Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In the ultra modern era, there is a huge debate about the topic that is every human have right to access clean water. Consequently, water supply should provided free of cost to every households. From my perspective, i completely agree with this notion not only because water is a basic human need for everyone and also without water they are unable to survive but also because of plantation and cleaning purpose. This essay will explore how these factors justify my opinion.

Firstly, the factor that compelled me to agree with this statement is water is crucial for everyone, even they are humans, plants or animals. Therefore, this basic need should provided free of cost to everyone. For instances, without free water a poor man face difficulties to survive because they have gardens in their home that needs water.

On the other hand, People use water in their homes not only drinking and washing purpose only, but also they use it for plantation to grow foods and vegetables domestically. For example, a individual use his garden to grow vegetables which reduce their monthly expenditures; Nevertheless, if he pay water bill that is not effective for him. Hence, every households should have free of cost water supply.

Thirdly, It goes without say that water is basic human need that helps to clean you and your house; therefore, everyone need free water to fulfill their daily needs. Thus, government should not put tax on water.

To sum up, access of clean water is a important for everyone. I inclined to believe that, Basic human need should be free of cost which helps them to survive easily in life.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you state that you “completely agree” and return to the idea that water should be free in the conclusion. You also give relevant reasons, including survival, household cleaning, and growing food. However, the response only partly develops the task’s central issue: why a universal free household supply is justified as a human right. The examples about gardens and reducing expenses are brief, and the claim that a water bill is “not effective” is not explained. The discussion also does not distinguish essential clean water from water used for gardening, which would help make the argument more convincing. Develop fewer reasons in greater depth, with a specific example or explanation for each.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphs generally focus on a reason, and signposts such as “Firstly,” “On the other hand,” and “To sum up” help readers follow the broad direction. However, progression between ideas is sometimes mechanical or unclear. “On the other hand” suggests a contrast, but the paragraph adds another supporting reason; “Thirdly” introduces a point that repeats the basic-need argument. Some links within sentences are also awkward, such as “not only … but also because of plantation.” Use transitions that accurately show the relationship between points, and organise the body around distinct, developed reasons rather than repeating the same claim.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate your main ideas, including “basic human need,” “water supply,” “survive,” and “monthly expenditures.” There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “compelled me” and “justify my opinion.” However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations sound unnatural, sometimes making the intended meaning less clear: “ultra modern era,” “free of cost,” “plantation,” and “not effective for him.” Repetition of “free” and “water” also limits flexibility. Choose more precise expressions for the argument—for example, distinguish household essentials from garden use—and check whether phrases are natural in context. The suggestions below offer alternatives for some recurring or awkward wording.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a sentence beginning “not only because” and clauses introduced by “because” and “if.” However, complex structures are often faulty, and frequent errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction can make the reader pause. Examples include “every human have right,” “water supply should provided,” “a poor man face difficulties,” and “if he pay water bill.” There are also problems with sentence boundaries and punctuation, such as the capitalisation after commas in “Nevertheless” and “People.” Practise accurate subject–verb agreement and complete verb patterns first, then build longer sentences from those reliable forms. Proofreading for articles and punctuation would also improve clarity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.