Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In recent years there has been a considerable debate about drinking clean water.Consuming water is considered as universal right of human beings.Consequently, water should be supplied to every home without any charge. I completely agree with this statement.

To begin with, one of the main reason is if someone does not have enough money so they will not be able to drink water. For humanity water supply is a basic right that everyone has in equal portions. Taking charge on basic human

needs is a shame for all mankind. For instance, the people living in africa had a large number of deaths due to money for water purification almost 60 percent of their citizens were facing this issue. As a result, their young generation is counted as the smallest population in the world.

On the other hand, there are several reasons why filtered water is essential for living things. Every field of life and sources of food require water.For example, crops require water to grow and produce vegetables, fruits and other source of food. Consequently, buying water causes major problems in society. Due to water scarcity, people may fight over limited water resources, which can eventually lead to social conflicts and serious disputes.Governments should create a pipelines to every single house of the country and supply treated water in equal amounts for drinking and for maintaining ecosytem.

In conclusion, I strongly believe in this idea. Since 70 percent of our society could not afford any source of food even a glass of water to survive.Water would be free for everyone.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction (“I completely agree”) and is restated in the conclusion. You give relevant reasons, including affordability, the importance of water for food production, and the risk of conflict over scarce supplies. However, the affordability argument is not fully explained, and the example about deaths in Africa is difficult to interpret: the link between purification costs, the stated percentage, and population size is unclear. The discussion also shifts from free household drinking water to water for crops and ecosystem maintenance without explaining how these points support the specific proposal. Develop each reason with a clearer explanation and a credible, directly relevant example, while distinguishing basic household access from wider water use.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs signalled by “To begin with” and “On the other hand,” and a conclusion. This gives the reader a broad sense of direction. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow. The Africa example moves abruptly from purification costs to deaths and then to the size of the young generation, with the relationships between these claims left unclear. The second body paragraph also combines food production, social conflict, and government pipelines without sufficiently connecting them. Some linking phrases, such as “Consequently” and “As a result,” feel mechanical or do not clearly express the relationship between ideas. Use clearer topic sentences and explain each link between claim, example, and conclusion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “universal right,” “water scarcity,” “limited water resources,” and “social conflicts,” which helps communicate the main argument. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “basic human needs.” However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unclear: “Taking charge on basic human needs,” “a large number of deaths due to money for water purification,” and “the smallest population” do not express the intended meanings naturally. Spelling errors such as “ecosyetm” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise, conventional combinations and check spelling; for example, explain that people cannot afford safe water rather than using the unclear phrase about money for purification.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including conditional reasoning (“if someone does not have enough money so they will not be able to drink water”) and a relative clause (“which can eventually lead to social conflicts”). However, complex structures are often not controlled accurately. The conditional sentence uses both “if” and “so” unnecessarily, and “one of the main reason is” has a singular/plural agreement error. Other examples include “Governments should create a pipelines” and “70 percent of our society could not afford,” where article, number, and verb-form choices need correction. Punctuation and spacing are also inconsistent, particularly where sentences run together. Practise building accurate clauses and checking agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries before adding complexity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.