Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is argued that the government should provide free water supply for every house since the access to the highly purified water is a fundamental human right. I strongly agree with the above statement because the pure water affects ones health and also it allows low income people access clean water. This essay will elaborate the above mentioned further proving that the clean water is a basic human right.

The consumption of clean water promotes better health benefits to the people. The distilled water is free of contaminants including carcinogenic fertilizers and metal ions such as magnesium and calcium. As a reults, number of diseases including cancer and kidney diseases can be avoided. As an example, the north central province holds the highest kidney patients due to the consumption of contaminated water. Therefore, the water should should be distributed free of charge, to keep them healthy. This will be indirectly advantagerous to the government because the cost of for cancer and kidney hospitals can be reduced.

Secondly the citizens should recieve clean water free of charge because the low income people cannot afford to pay for large volume of water continuously. A large volume of water is required to for dailty consuption including cooking, promoting use of contaminated water with in poor people. For instance, the heavy duty on electricity and transportation led to increase in thr price of a litre of purified water. Hence the The all the citizen should have the equal right to recieve free water.

In conclusion, every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge so that the human health will improved enpowering low income people while reducing the high cost of cancer and kidney disease units in the country.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you strongly agree that water should be provided free, and the conclusion returns to this view. You give two relevant reasons—health protection and affordability for low-income households—and support them with examples, including contaminated water in the north central province and rising costs. This addresses the task, but the reasons are not equally developed. The health paragraph explains possible benefits and government savings, while the affordability paragraph makes its point more briefly and the link between electricity and transport costs and water prices could be clearer. Also, distinguish access to safe water as a right from the claim that every household must receive unlimited water at no charge; explaining this distinction would make your argument more fully reasoned. The response meets the stated length requirement; 13 words copied from the prompt were not counted.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion. Sequencing words such as “Secondly,” “For instance,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument, and each paragraph has a recognisable central point. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “As a reults” does not clearly show how the example supports the preceding claim, and the transition from higher electricity and transportation costs to the right to free water needs an explicit explanation. The repeated references to “the above statement” and “the above mentioned” are also less direct than stating the argument itself. Use clearer links between cause, example, and conclusion, and make pronoun references precise.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “contaminants,” “carcinogenic,” “low income,” and “kidney diseases,” which helps communicate the subject. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “fundamental human right” and “provided free of charge.” However, inaccurate word choice, collocation, and spelling reduce precision: “distilled water” is not the same as safe drinking water, “heavy duty on electricity” is unclear, and “advantagerous” and “dailty consuption” are misspelled. Some phrases are awkward or repetitive, including “the clean water is a basic human right.” Choose vocabulary that accurately describes treated drinking water and use natural combinations of words. Proofreading spelling and avoiding unnecessary repetition would make your meaning more precise.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a reason clause with “because” and a result clause beginning “As a result.” The overall meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors recur and occasionally make sentences difficult to follow. Examples include “the access to the highly purified water,” “it allows low income people access clean water,” and “the human health will improved,” where articles, verb forms, or sentence patterns need correction. There are also agreement and construction problems in “number of diseases … can be avoided” and “A large volume of water is required to for daily consumption.” Repeated words and punctuation, such as “should should” and the comma before “to keep them healthy,” also need attention. Practise accurate clause patterns and check each sentence for complete, correctly formed verbs.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.