Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The easily accessible clean water is a fundamental human right. Therefore, every house should have a free of cost water supply. I entirely agree to this statement because water is everyday need for humans, required for cooking, washing and cleaning. Also, it is essential for living because human body is around 70 percent water and clean water is crucial for health and survival.

To begin with, we need water for our everyday activities like cleaning our homes, washing our clothes and preparing meals. Water is basic right of human beings but I have seen that shortage of clean and pure water especially in big cities is rising day by day. For example, one of my friend, who lives in Lahore, Pakistan, told me recently that she is not able to access clean water for cooking or for doing other households, it usually comes with dust particles or other impurities in it, she said, which is very concerning. She also told me that they have to pay separate bills for water monthly, although it is not even safe to consume. It really made me upset because one of the vital requirement for life is being overviewed by the officials.

Moreover, drinking clean water is extremely crucial for health especially for children and elderly people because their immune systems are not strong enough to combat infections and diseases caused by contamination or unhyiegenic conditions. In my perspective, the water should be provided free of cost to the citizens not only because it is requirement of everyone but also because it is their right. The officials should look into this matter and try to improve the methods for saving ground water from being contaminated and to make sure that it reachs safely to everyone.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you entirely agree that households should receive clean water free of charge. You address the human-rights and health aspects and support your argument with the account of your friend in Lahore, including the poor water quality and monthly bills. These relevant details help extend the response. However, the discussion focuses more on why clean water matters than on why the supply itself should be free; for example, the financial burden on households or how free provision could be funded is not explored. The point about officials protecting groundwater is also introduced briefly rather than developed. Explaining these implications would make the argument more fully supported and precise.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs give reasons and an example, and the final sentence offers a recommendation. The progression from everyday needs to health is easy to follow, and signposts such as “To begin with” and “Moreover” help guide the reader. To strengthen cohesion further, make the relationship between the example and your central claim more explicit: the Lahore account shows unsafe, paid-for water, but you could explain directly how this supports free provision. Some links are mechanical or repetitive, particularly repeated references to water being a “right” and the use of “also.” A concluding sentence that briefly restates your position would give the response a more complete sense of closure.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “fundamental human right,” “contamination,” “immune systems,” and “ground water,” which makes the subject clear. There are also attempts at more specific phrasing, such as “combat infections” and “separate bills.” However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural: “free of cost” is repeated, “households” is used where you mean household activities, and “being overviewed” does not express the intended idea. Spelling errors such as “unhyiegenic” and “reaches” also reduce accuracy. Aim for more natural collocations and check spelling; this would make your vocabulary more precise without needing unnecessarily complex words.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “one of my friend, who lives in Lahore” and a reason clause beginning “because.” Most of the meaning remains clear, but some grammatical errors occur. For example, “one of my friend” needs a plural noun, and “it reachs safely to everyone” has an incorrect verb form and agreement. The opening phrase “The easily accessible clean water” also has an awkward article and adjective structure, while “water is everyday need” is missing an article. Some long sentences, especially the account of your friend’s report, would be clearer if divided or punctuated more carefully. Review articles, plurals, and subject–verb agreement while retaining your complex sentence attempts.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.