Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

I agree that providing access to purified water to every single house is very important and also every single house should have a clean water supplier, that cannot be accessed without money if clean water is provided withput charging any money that leads to maintain stablity in GDP.

Providing water supply to every indvidual house is a good idea, but government should ready to face lot of consequnces by obtaing free supplier, instead government should charge a small amount of money from people who need water supplier.For instance, in 2012 in india people faced water scarcity for tthe first time then government took measures to clean the river and provide water for the country, however this is came into exsistence by utilizing people money.

For providing water supply to the household use government should take mesures in building canlas, by building canals all the homes in village are dependent on this canal.Many officals should thinkover this,Therefore construction of canal will take place when there is support of locals, for example in 2015 a small village named Revallapalem has suffered with lack of water problem, no one has no idea what is the reason then the people in this village has joined together and decided to constructed a canal, which became the major source of water provider.

In summary, i agree that getting permission for clean water is an people right, but there is no way to provide a water supplier that is free of cost for any use.Finally i think that a small amount of money can be offered for water suppliers to get clean water.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You give a recognisable position: you support access to clean water but reject making the supply entirely free, proposing instead that users pay a small amount. This addresses the central issue, and the examples about government-funded water treatment and villagers constructing a canal are relevant to water access. However, the argument only partly answers the question because the distinction between a basic right to water and the cost of supplying it is not explained. The claim that free water would “maintain stability in GDP” is unclear and unsupported, while the examples are described without showing how they prove that households should pay. Develop the reasons for your position and explain how a modest charge could preserve access for people who cannot afford it.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, and each body paragraph broadly focuses on water provision. This gives the reader some organisation. However, the progression of the argument is not consistently clear: the opening links free water to GDP stability, while the next paragraph argues for charging users, without explaining the relationship between these points. Connectors such as “instead,” “however” and “therefore” are sometimes used mechanically or do not clearly show the intended relationship. The canal example also shifts from government responsibility to local action without linking that shift to your main position. Use clearer topic sentences, develop one reason at a time, and make references and transitions show how each example supports your argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “water scarcity,” “clean the river,” “construction of canal” and “source of water.” This is enough to communicate the general subject, but the range is limited and several word choices or collocations make the meaning less natural. For example, “clean water supplier” and “water supplier” are used where “water supply” is intended, and “permission for clean water” does not express the idea of access. Spelling errors such as “stablity,” “consequnces” and “indvidual” are also noticeable. Build a more precise set of phrases for discussing access, infrastructure, costs and public services, and check spelling and word forms during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentences, including clauses introduced by “if,” “when” and “however.” However, complex sentences are often difficult to follow because of errors in sentence construction, verb forms and agreement. For example, “if clean water is provided … that leads to maintain” has an unclear clause structure, and “this is came into exsistence” uses an incorrect verb form. There are also problems with articles and number, as in “an people right,” and punctuation, including run-on sentences joined by commas. These errors sometimes make the intended relationships between ideas unclear. Practise separating complete ideas into sentences, then check subject–verb agreement, tense and article use before adding subordinate clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.