Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Access to clean water is a basic neccessity for every human being. Some poeple believe that water supply should be free for everyone as it is their basic right. Although it is included as a basic need, i strongly disagree with free water consumption because it will cause burden to government, and citizens might over use water if it was free to consume.

One reason why i believe water supply should not be for free because providing clean water costs more and it will create a burden to the government. Authorities spend a fortune on the facilities such as pipelines, storage systems and maintainances for water to remain safe for consumption. If governments will not charge citizens for water supply, they will have to increase tax in order to balance the economy. As a result, people will have financial burdens because of rise in tax.

Another reason why water should not be free even if inflation is touching the roof because people might over consume water, if government will not charge them. For instance, people who over consume water and do not think of future might struggle in days of drought, and it will be people who will suffer the most, especially farmers, as they require water for agriculture. As a result, government should charge fee that every citizen can afford, and does not make it difficult for them, so that people do not go rogue when consuming water.

In conclusion, providing clean water requires time, effort and money. So i firmly believe that charging bare minimum for consumption of water will not burden government and people will be carefully ustilize water without over consuming it.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you disagree with free household water and support charging an affordable fee. You give two relevant reasons—public costs and the risk of waste—and include a drought example, so the response addresses the question. The explanation of infrastructure costs is reasonably developed, including pipelines and storage systems, but the claim that taxes would rise and burden people could be explained more carefully. The second reason is also relevant, though the link between household overuse and farmers’ hardship is asserted rather than fully demonstrated. To strengthen the response further, develop these cause-and-effect links and acknowledge the distinction between guaranteeing access to essential water and making all consumption free.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present separate reasons, and the conclusion restates your position. Progression is easy to follow, and signposts such as “One reason,” “Another reason,” and “As a result” help readers track the argument. Some linking is a little mechanical, however, and “As a result” is used for consequences that need a clearer explanation. In the second body paragraph, the move from household overuse to farmers’ difficulties could be connected more explicitly. Use a wider range of transitions and make references between claims clearer, so the argument flows through the reasoning rather than relying mainly on formulaic markers.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use adequate vocabulary to discuss the topic, including “water supply,” “facilities,” “storage systems,” “drought,” and “agriculture.” There are also attempts at more expressive language, such as “spend a fortune” and “inflation is touching the roof,” but these are informal or awkward for an academic essay. Several word-choice, collocation, and spelling errors are noticeable, including “over consume,” “maintainances,” “bare minimum,” and “ustilize.” These do not prevent understanding, but they reduce precision and control. Aim for accurate academic collocations and check spelling and word forms; for example, describe the cost of maintaining infrastructure and refer to excessive water use rather than using conversational expressions.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a concession with “Although” and conditional structures such as “if it was free to consume.” Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “One reason why i believe water supply should not be for free because…” lacks a complete, correctly formed clause; “If governments will not charge” uses an unsuitable verb form after “if”; and “people will be carefully ustilize water” has an incorrect verb construction. Capitalise “I” consistently, and review articles and sentence patterns when introducing reasons. More accurate control of conditionals and complete clauses would improve clarity while preserving the range of structures you already attempt.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.