Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

nowadays ,clean water is one of the most important necessities of human life . some people beleive that every household should receive a free water supply .I completely agree with this statement because water is essential for survival and good health.

To begin with providing free water can bring several benifits of society, it helps peple stay healthy. every people deserve this benifit of free clean water.However there are many poor people who can not afford the clean water bills and any kind of filters in their homes if it is free poor people can easily get clean water and stay healthy with families.

Moreover ,all the people should equal rights , some people suffring from desases because they do not have clean water to drink and cook food for their families government should provide clean water supply free to every people it is a most important thing in human life to survive

Although,I strongly agree with this point every home should have a clean water supply without any charges .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you completely agree that households should receive free water. You also give relevant reasons, including that water is essential for survival and that poorer families may struggle to pay for clean water. However, the response addresses the task only partially because these points are stated briefly rather than explained with specific examples or fuller reasoning. The claim that free water helps people stay healthy, for instance, could be developed by explaining how access to safe water prevents illness. The response is also below the required 250 words, so there is limited space to develop your argument. Add a further supporting point and explain each reason in more detail, while maintaining your clear position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs beginning with “To begin with” and “Moreover,” and a concluding statement. This helps the reader identify your main position and supporting points. However, progression within the paragraphs is limited, and several ideas are joined together without clear sentence boundaries, particularly in the second body paragraph. The conclusion repeats your agreement rather than drawing the reasons together. Some linking is also mechanical, and the reference in “every people” is unclear. To improve, give each paragraph one main idea, explain it in a logical sequence, and use full stops to separate complete thoughts. Use linking phrases only where they show a clear relationship between ideas.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use basic vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “clean water,” “survival,” “healthy,” and “poor people,” so your main message is generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several words or phrases are repeated, especially “clean water,” “free,” and “people.” There are also noticeable spelling errors, such as “beleive,” “benifits,” “peple,” and “desases,” which reduce accuracy and can make the reader pause. Some expressions are imprecise, for example “benefits of society” and “every people.” Build a wider set of topic-related terms and check spelling carefully. More precise phrases such as “low-income households” and “access to safe drinking water” would help express your ideas clearly and appropriately.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You communicate your main opinion using simple sentence patterns, and you attempt to connect ideas with clauses, as in “because water is essential for survival and good health.” However, the range of structures is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to affect fluency. For example, “every people deserve” has an agreement error, while “all the people should equal rights” is missing a verb and a necessary preposition. Several sentences run together without appropriate punctuation, particularly the sentence beginning “some people suffring from desases.” Capitalisation and spacing around punctuation are also inconsistent. Practise building accurate complete sentences first, then combine them using conjunctions. Check subject–verb agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries when proofreading.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.