Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is argued that clean water is the simplest and primary human right and every household must be provided a water supply out of any additional charges . This essay agrees with this idea because water is crucial for daily life usage and the cost of its purification exceeds the capacities of an average person .

First and Foremost , water is utilised on daily basis in cleaning , cooking and drinking . That is to say , many families could be under risks of cancer and diseases when using infected water , especially in third world countries where general hygiene is not considered a matter of concern .In low income families , acquiring water filters is percieved as a luxury not as a necessity .For example in third world countries , the largest proportion of the population have low income , which means that the spread of water caused diseases would be tremendous.Somalia and south africa for instance , have the highest rate of colera due to the usage of infected water .

Secondly , governments are held accountable for the protection of their populations by providing necessary amenities such as water filters and water purification facilities . This is because the process of cleaning water from impurities is expensive and requires sophisticated materials . Furthermore, it also shows the hygenic position of the country itself in the international arena .That is because no one would want to visit or cooperate with a country that can't even provide clean water to their citiziens .Studies conducted by the UN showed that countries with water purification facilities have the lowest ratios of illnesses and are more frequented by foreigners .

To conclude , i strongly side next to the idea that it is a crucial human right for every household to benefit of clean water supply without getting to pay for it because it doesn't only affect the sanity of the nation but also affects the country's image itself .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction and conclusion: you support free access to clean water. You give relevant reasons, including the health risks of contaminated water and the government’s responsibility to provide purification facilities, and you attempt to support them with examples. However, the response does not fully develop the specific proposal that every home’s supply should be free. Much of the discussion concerns providing clean water and purification infrastructure, rather than explaining how free household supply should work or why charging users is unacceptable. The claims about disease rates in Somalia and South Africa and the UN study are also broad and not explained in detail. Develop these points with clearer reasoning and more precise examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present separate reasons, and a conclusion restates your position. Sequencing phrases such as “First and Foremost,” “Secondly,” and “To conclude” help readers follow the main stages. However, some connections are mechanical, and several sentences within the body paragraphs move quickly between points. For example, the second paragraph shifts from purification costs to a country’s international image without fully explaining the link. The example about disease rates also follows a general claim without a clear transition or explanation. Use linking expressions more selectively and make each paragraph’s reasoning progress step by step, with clearer references between claims and examples.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “purification facilities,” “impurities,” “low income families,” and “international arena.” These choices help communicate the main ideas, and attempts at more formal language are evident. Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, however, such as “daily life usage,” “under risks,” “the sanity of the nation,” and “side next to the idea.” Spelling errors, including “percieved,” “colera,” “hygenic,” and “citiziens,” also reduce accuracy. These issues do not prevent understanding, but they make parts of the response less natural. Focus on standard collocations and check spelling carefully; prefer precise, familiar academic phrasing over expressions that sound formal but do not fit the meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a reason clause with “because” and a relative clause in “a country that can't even provide clean water.” Most of the argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. Examples include missing articles or prepositions in “on daily basis” and “benefit of clean water supply,” and awkward sentence construction in “every household must be provided a water supply.” There are also punctuation and capitalization problems, such as spaces before commas and lowercase “i” in the conclusion. These errors are noticeable, although they rarely obscure your meaning. Review article use, preposition patterns, and sentence boundaries, then proofread for consistent capitalization and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.