Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays clean water is very essential for the mankind to survive. Some people believe that government should provide water supply to every house free of duty. I personally disagree with this statement because water is precious and if they'd give it for free people might forgot its value.

To begin with, "WATER IS LIFE". This slogan is the key we need to understand. Human body is made of 70 per cent water. Also, every living creature on the globe highly depended on water, because water provides hydration to the body; helps to clean our body and plays a vital role in cooking food. For example, throughout the normal day people need water in every aspects: cooking, washing, drinking, bathing and cleaning. Our lives crucially depends on clean water and its a basic human right.

On the other hand, making it completely free for charge might create a negative effect. There are limited source of clean water on the earth. Also, it is a privilege to have clean water at home because there is only 3 per cent of water which is drinkable on the Globe. We should use it respectively and to create a respect and value put charges on it, is a very essential step for government to take. For example, according to "TIMES OF INDIA"- a respective news publication, 85 per cent of people decrease the excessive use of clean water after initiation of a concept that is water bill and attaching the water-meter in the Mumbai City of INDIA.

To conclude, Water is very essential for mankind and its a basic human right to have a access of clean water. However, giving it free of charge make it less valuable and people start wasting it. For that reason government should put charges on it so its value remain high.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you disagree with making household water free, and the conclusion returns to the idea that charges discourage waste. You also address the human-rights aspect by acknowledging that clean water is essential and a basic right. The discussion is relevant, with reasons about scarcity and conservation, and the Mumbai water-meter example provides support. This meets the task well, though the response does not fully resolve the tension between a basic right and charging for access: it could distinguish a guaranteed essential supply from charges for higher consumption. The claim that people waste water when it is free is also asserted more than explained. Developing these points and qualifying broad claims would make the argument more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present the importance and scarcity of water, and a conclusion restates your position. Transitions such as “To begin with,” “On the other hand,” and “To conclude” make the main stages easy to follow. However, some links are mechanical, and the first body paragraph moves from water’s importance to the slogan and then to a list of uses without clearly showing how these points support your disagreement with free provision. The relationship between the right to clean water and the case for charging is also not fully connected. Use topic sentences that directly advance your argument, and make references such as “it” and “this” more precise.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “hydration,” “drinkable,” “excessive use,” and “water-meter,” which helps communicate the subject. There are also attempts at emphatic phrasing, such as “WATER IS LIFE,” although the all-capital slogan is less suitable for a formal essay. Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural: “free of duty” should be “free of charge,” “limited source” needs a more natural form, and “use it respectively” does not express the intended idea. “For the mankind” and “a respective news publication” are also awkward. These choices do not prevent understanding, but more precise, natural phrasing and less repetition of “essential” and “water” would improve control.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional in “if they’d give it for free” and a reason clause beginning “because.” The main ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors recur and reduce accuracy. For example, “people might forgot” should be “people might forget,” “every living creature … depended” needs “depends,” and “Our lives … depends” needs subject–verb agreement. Articles and sentence construction also need attention in “have a access” and “making it completely free for charge might create a negative effect.” There are punctuation and sentence-boundary issues, including the semicolon in the list of water’s functions. Practise checking verb forms, agreement, articles, and punctuation while retaining your attempts at varied structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.