Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Today, basic human rights have received so much significance. One of the most common human right is the right of access to clean water. There has been an ongoing debate to provide such necessity to every individual of the society.

Everyone should have the access of clean water irrespective of their age, class, color, or creed. Even such fundamental rights are mentioned in our constitution. Cooking and Drinking specifically requires the clean water and is important for the governments and local authorities to provide the water supply in every house without any cost. For example, significant number of people die every year in rural areas because of consuming unclean water causing multiple diseases. People who do not have access to clean water, boils it to remove all impurities and kill the bacteria so it can be ready to consume.

The counsellors and head of areas have introduced the filtration plants to provide the clean water for the residents. However, incorporation of such filtration units is not enough as we need water for almost every activity. Our house chores are highly dependant on clean water. There must be a bill introduced in the parliament to allow individual water supply for every home.

I completely agree that clean water is our basic need and right. Human right activists are also encouraging the free access to clean water to avoid any kind of viruses. Consumption of filthy water will cause infections and diseases among the children and adults. Thus, it is fundamentally important to provide the clean water to every individual in the society.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you agree that clean water should be supplied to every home without charge, and you give relevant reasons, including health risks from contaminated water and the need for water in household activities. The example of people boiling water and the reference to deaths in rural areas help explain the public-health argument. However, some points are asserted rather than developed. For instance, the claim that a bill should be introduced in parliament is not explained in terms of how free provision would be funded or managed, and the discussion of filtration plants does not clearly show how they support your proposal. Develop these points with a specific explanation or example, and address the practical implications of free supply more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: it introduces the issue, presents reasons, discusses filtration plants and household needs, and ends by restating your position. Paragraphing generally helps the reader follow this progression. Some connections, however, are mechanical or unclear. The shift from filtration plants to the need for a parliamentary bill is abrupt, and “However” does not clearly signal the relationship between those ideas. The final paragraph also repeats the health argument without adding much to the discussion. Use linking phrases that show the precise relationship between claims, and make each paragraph develop a distinct point. Clearer references to who is responsible for providing water would also strengthen the flow.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “fundamental rights,” “filtration plants,” “impurities,” and “infections and diseases.” These choices make the subject clear, and you attempt some less common expressions. At times, however, word choice and collocation are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “received so much significance,” “access of clean water,” and “incorporation of such filtration units.” There are also inconsistent capital letters in “Drinking” and “Color,” and “dependant” is misspelled in this context. Aim for more natural combinations and check spelling and word forms. More precise vocabulary for costs, public provision, and water treatment would help you express the argument with greater flexibility.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “people ... because of consuming unclean water causing multiple diseases” and a conditional-style explanation of boiling water. Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “One of the most common human right” needs plural agreement, while “People ... boils it” has a subject–verb agreement error and an unclear pronoun reference. Articles and prepositions also need attention in “have the access of clean water” and “in every house without any cost.” Review agreement, article use, and sentence construction, especially when a sentence contains several linked ideas. Greater control of these patterns would make your reasoning easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.