Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Usage of pure water is regular freedom of individuals. Furthermore water for daily use in houses must be not paid at all. I totally disagree with this viewpoint because supplying water system needs financial invest and there is no guarantee that water we use our daily life is pure clear.

Water we use in our home is result of huge chain system which is human made. Pumping water from thousand kilometers under the ground and making the tubes that connect each houses together requires long term computing from different industries scientists. All these profession need to paid by government and that salary is from the tax that government collect from citizens. For instance, most of countries water service is managing by the government. Furthermore they developed this as one of the biggest industry, also preparing professions who will only do research in water supply service.

In modern years, as our society highly developing, people started to more care for their health. Certainly, water is largest supporter for our body to keep alive. Furthermore, we can not give 100% sure to all water form nature is pure and clean. This reason caused that reason to increase quality of water. For example, many companies developing the brand new package of water which are includes different vitamins and minerals and advertising mainly focusing on our immune system. This idea give belief to us the paid water is more beneficial than original water from nature.

In conclusion, this essay strongly disagree with the statement because water supply in our home is result of someone's hard work, and citizens prefer paid water than free at least they can have a information and resource what they are using.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You state a clear disagreement in the opening and conclusion, and the discussion of the infrastructure and labour involved in supplying water is relevant. However, the response only partly addresses the central claim that every home should receive a basic supply free of charge. The point that water systems require investment does not explain why households, rather than taxpayers or another funding source, should pay directly. The second body paragraph shifts towards bottled water, vitamins and commercial advertising, which is not a strong explanation of why household water should not be free. Develop a more direct argument—for example, how free provision could be funded, or how charging might support maintenance—and use a specific example to support it.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. The first body paragraph focuses on the infrastructure behind water supply, while the second introduces water quality and health, so the reader can identify the main topics. However, progression between and within these ideas is not always clear. Connectors such as “Furthermore” are repeated, and the move from public water systems to packaged water is abrupt. Some references are also difficult to follow, as in “This reason caused that reason to increase quality of water.” Use clearer topic sentences and explain how each example supports your position. More precise links between claims and evidence would make the argument easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “water supply,” “government,” “tax,” “industries” and “vitamins and minerals,” which helps communicate the subject. However, the range is limited by repeated general words such as “water,” “reason” and “developing,” and several inaccurate word choices or collocations make meaning less clear. For example, “regular freedom” does not express the idea of a human right, and “long term computing” appears to mean planning or development. Phrases such as “paid water” and “original water from nature” are also imprecise in this context. Aim for accurate topic-specific expressions and check whether each word fits its surrounding phrase.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentences, including a sentence beginning “because” and one using “which,” but complex structures are often not controlled accurately. Errors in verb forms and agreement occur in phrases such as “need to paid,” “water service is managing,” and “many companies developing.” Articles, plurals and sentence construction also cause problems: “each houses,” “is result of huge chain system,” and “This idea give belief to us” are difficult to process. These recurring errors sometimes make the intended relationships unclear. Practise building accurate subject–verb–object sentences first, then add subordinate clauses, checking verb forms, articles and agreement in each sentence.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.