Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Water is a necessity to all homesteads in any country and remains as a basic human right. The need for ensuring adequate and clean water supply to it's citizens by the authorities should not only be a priority but also be free. I therefore strongly agree that all governments should direct a budget that is enough for connecting clean and safe water to households without surcharging them to emsure healthy living and promote production in industries and irrigation schemes.

When water is available in plenty, industries are able to engage in continuous creation of goods and services. This will ensure continuous supply of commodities to the market hence curbing food shortages as well as ensuring stability in prices of products. As a result, cases of shortages through hoarding will not exist in the society. Another key benefit of constant and free supply of water is that clean water will lower spread of water borne diseases, for instance bilharzia and typhoid.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

Your position is clear: you strongly agree that household water should be free, and you give relevant reasons involving industry, food supply, prices, and disease. However, the response addresses the task only partially because these points are asserted rather than sufficiently explained or supported with examples. For instance, the link between free water and preventing hoarding is not made clear, and the health point is not developed beyond naming bilharzia and typhoid. The response also contains 160 words, so it does not meet the required minimum of 250. Develop each reason with explanation and a relevant example, and consider addressing how governments could fund or manage free provision to make your argument more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The ideas follow a clear overall sequence: you state your position, explain possible economic benefits, and then introduce a health benefit. Linking expressions such as “therefore,” “As a result,” and “Another key benefit” help readers follow this progression. The paragraphing is also appropriate for the short response, with the opening position separated from supporting reasons. To make the organisation more effective, give each main reason its own developed paragraph and use clearer links between the claims within it. For example, the move from continuous production to food shortages and then to hoarding would benefit from an explicit explanation of how these outcomes connect. A fuller conclusion would also help bring the argument to a clear close.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use a reasonably varied range of topic vocabulary, including “adequate,” “continuous supply,” “water-borne diseases,” and “irrigation schemes.” These choices show some ability to discuss public services and their effects, although several expressions are imprecise or unnatural. “Direct a budget” and “without surcharging them” do not express the intended ideas naturally; “allocate sufficient funding” and “without charging households” would be clearer. There are also spelling errors in “it's” and “em sure,” and “homesteads” is less suitable than “households” in this context. Greater accuracy in collocation and spelling, alongside the range already attempted, would make your argument more precise and fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

You use both simple and more complex sentence forms, including the opening sentence with “that” and the conditional structure “When water is available in plenty, industries are able to…”. Most of the meaning remains clear, and the response shows some control of longer sentences. However, some grammatical and punctuation errors remain. In “The need for ensuring…,” the construction is awkward; “The authorities need to ensure…” would be more direct. The phrase “to it's citizens” should use the possessive “its,” and the sentence beginning “I therefore strongly agree” becomes difficult to manage because several purposes are joined together. Break this into shorter sentences and check possessives, spacing, and sentence boundaries to improve accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.