Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Humans are putting charges and taxes on almost everything but what if it is a part of basic necessity. We all know that the basic necessity of a human being include shelter, food and water. The earth is covered in 70% of water from which approx 3-4% water is safe to consume and people are charging on that too. I believe that a clean water should be accessible to each individual with free of cost.

There are many individuals on earth who cannot afford basic necessities, They eat food from trash cans or left overs and drink water from gutters or toilets. Drinking waters from gutters or toilets can lead to harmful diseases. As per research there are high chances of spreading of diseases through dirty water which can lead to severe damage to a human body. As to keep the life expectancy of human being clean water should be free of charge for every home.

Talking about now how will government provide or afford the cost of clean water, Government can charge small amount of tax on other products like food, clothes, furniture, luxury products etc to cover the cost of clean water, as to make the water clean and consumable to an individual can cost much.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you believe clean water should be free for every home, and you give relevant reasons, including the health risks of unsafe water and the possibility of funding provision through taxes on other goods. However, the response addresses the issue only partially because these points are brief and not fully explained. For example, the claim that people drink from gutters or toilets would be stronger with a specific, carefully explained example, and the proposed tax solution needs more detail about how it could work fairly. The response also contains 208 words, so it does not meet the required minimum of 250. Develop your reasons and add a further relevant point to address the task more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: it introduces your view, gives a health-related reason, and then considers how free provision might be funded. This makes the main line of argument understandable. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes abrupt, and some links are mechanical or unclear. For instance, “As to keep the life expectancy” does not clearly connect the preceding health claims to your conclusion, while “Talking about now how will government provide” is an awkward transition into the funding point. Use clearer topic sentences and connect each explanation directly to the claim it supports. Separating the funding proposal into a developed paragraph and using precise referencing would make the organisation easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “basic necessity,” “diseases,” “life expectancy,” and “cost of clean water,” so the reader can understand your central concerns. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are noticeably inaccurate, which makes some sentences less natural. Examples include “with free of cost,” “Drinking waters,” and “safe to consume”; these need more idiomatic phrasing and more precise use of countable and uncountable nouns. Repetition of “basic necessity,” “water,” and “clean” also limits flexibility. Build a wider set of topic-specific expressions, such as “access to potable water” and “water-treatment costs,” and check collocations when revising.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You communicate your main position using a mixture of simple statements and some longer sentences, including the explanation that dirty water can cause disease. However, control is uneven, and errors in sentence construction, agreement, articles, and punctuation sometimes make the argument harder to read. For example, “the basic necessity of a human being include” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “I believe that a clean water should be accessible” uses an unnecessary article. The opening question beginning “but what if it is a part of basic necessity” is also not integrated smoothly into the sentence. Practise accurate complex sentences with clauses such as “because” and “although,” and proofread each sentence for agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.