Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Many people believe that access to clean water is essential humen right and the government should offer free water supply for all citizen. From my perspective, i totally agree with this view because free water sources helps poor or limited encome public access to clean water and decrease certian disease comes from unclean water.

In the begin with, the govenments have a full responsiblity of affording a free clean water supply for thier citizen to decline the number of people how are get pandemic diseases are come form dirty water sources. When the government allow individuals those who have limited earned to access to clean water, they are propably decrease the cost that need to give for hospital and medical staff. For istance, many people get illness coused by specific bacteria named colera which grow and spread through unclean water sources, so when lower encome people prevent of pay charge to get safety water, they will affect by colera disease and they will need to have unwell leaves to stay at homes for several days. As a result, the majority of people are going to the hospitals and the government need to pay more money for the medical staff employees how are working in hospitals and for the highly expensive treatment.

In conclusion, i still believe that access to safety water sources is a vital human right and the govenment should provide facilities for lower encome individuals to help them get clean water and prevent spreading of harmful disease such as colera that come and grow on unclean water supply.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you agree that clean water should be provided free, and the conclusion returns to this view. You also give a relevant reason, linking access to safe water with preventing illness and reducing pressure on hospitals, and the cholera example helps illustrate the point. However, the response develops this health argument much more than the broader claim that water is a basic right. The idea that governments would save on medical costs is asserted rather than explained with a clear chain of reasoning, and there is no second distinct supporting argument or counterargument. Develop the example more precisely and explain why free provision is justified as a right, not only as a way to reduce disease.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, a main supporting paragraph and a conclusion, and the central argument is generally easy to follow. The main paragraph moves from government responsibility to disease prevention and then to hospital costs. However, the progression is weakened by unclear or mechanical linking, such as “In the begin with” and “As a result,” where the relationship between the points is not fully established. The long main paragraph also combines several stages of reasoning without clear internal organisation. Use a more direct topic sentence, divide the health and cost effects into clearly connected steps, and ensure each linking phrase accurately signals the relationship between ideas.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “clean water,” “human right,” “bacteria,” “hospitals” and “treatment,” so the reader can identify the subject and your main argument. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate word choices, collocations and spelling errors make parts of the response difficult to read. Examples include “limited encome,” “safety water,” “unwell leaves” and “pandemic diseases” for illnesses caused by contaminated water. Repeated use of “clean water” and “government” also limits variety. Build a more accurate set of topic phrases, such as “safe drinking water,” “waterborne diseases” and “medical expenses,” and check spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a conditional structure in “when the government allow individuals…” and a cause-and-effect sentence beginning “As a result.” This shows an effort to express relationships between ideas. However, control is inconsistent, and errors in agreement, articles, verb forms and sentence construction sometimes make the meaning hard to follow. For example, “free water sources helps” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “diseases are come” and “they will affect by” use incorrect verb forms. Some sentences are also overloaded with clauses, particularly the long example about cholera and hospital costs. Practise building accurate shorter sentences first, then combine them with controlled subordinate clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.