Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is often argued by some people that free of cost clean water should be supplied to homes. Some might disagree with the statement, I completely agree. Not only because poor families can get clean water and clean water usage removes diseases but also because it can help people feel more energetic and work better.

There are multiple benefits associated with the supply of clean water free of cost. Firstly, through this approach clean water can reach every poor family which can not afford clean water. As poor families use contaminate water in their household and also for drinking. Take an example of Uganda, where 90% of the people use contaminate water because they cann't afford clean water. Thus, supply of clean water free of cost is a better approach to humanity.

Secondly, some families use clean water for drinking and use contaminate water in other household and also in cooking. As they can't afford plenty of clean water to use everwhere because it costs too much. For instance, a recent survey conducted in Spain revealed that 60% of the people use contaminate water in household except drinking. Hence, free clean water help people to use it in their daily life.

Finally, clean water help people to stay immune and away of diseases. As clean water usage help the body functions to take place more effectively which make people more energetic.

To sum up, I believe that free of cost clean water should be supplied. Not only because it reaches poor families and make us away of diseses but also make us feel more energetic in work daily routine.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you completely agree that households should receive clean water free of charge, and you give relevant reasons concerning affordability, health and daily use. The examples about Uganda and Spain also show an attempt to support your claims. However, the response addresses the issue only partially because several points are asserted rather than explained. For example, the claim that clean water makes people “more energetic” is not developed, and the survey figures are presented without explaining their source or how they support universal free provision. Clarify what “free” would cover and develop fewer reasons with a clear explanation of their consequences to make the argument more convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, three body paragraphs signalled by “Firstly,” “Secondly” and “Finally,” and a concluding summary. This helps readers identify the main points. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear, and linking words can make the argument feel mechanical. The second paragraph, for instance, moves from affordability to household use and then to a survey without clearly connecting these ideas. Several sentences beginning with “As” are fragments, which also interrupt the flow. Use complete sentences and make the relationship between each claim, explanation and example explicit. More varied referencing and transitions would help the essay develop as a connected argument rather than a sequence of repeated points.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “clean water,” “contaminate water,” “poor families” and “diseases,” so the central meaning is generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, word-form and spelling errors make the writing less precise. “Contaminate water” should be “contaminated water,” while “free of cost” is an awkward repeated phrase; “free of charge” is more natural. Other errors include “everywhere,” “can’t” in formal writing, and “diseses.” Repetition of “clean water” and “help” also limits flexibility. Build a wider set of accurate expressions for access, affordability and public health, and check spelling and collocations carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt some complex structures, such as “Not only because … but also because …,” and use simple sentences to state your position. However, the complex attempts are often incomplete or inaccurate, and errors occur frequently enough to affect clarity. For example, “Some might disagree with the statement, I completely agree” joins two independent clauses incorrectly, while “As poor families use…” and “As they can’t afford…” are incomplete sentences. Subject–verb agreement is also inconsistent: “free clean water help” and “clean water usage help” need singular verbs. Practise forming complete sentences with subordinate clauses, and check agreement and sentence boundaries. Greater control of these basics would make your ideas easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.