Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-12
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Ever since 20th century took place, there have been immense changes in every aspect of life. Therefore, the way of living has totally changed over the time periods and the clean water supply has become the debetable issue among society, as some people think that it is the duty of the government to provide clean water, but others are opposite to it. This essay will intend to explain all the viewpoints thoroughly in the upcoming paragraphs before reaching any conclusion.
On the one hand, there are many reasons why government should offer free water supply to their residents. First and foremost is that it is the duty of the government to supply clean water because people are paying a large amount of tax to the government for their basic human right, which are extremely important in determining the current scenarios, so it is imperative for our lives. Secondly, some people are not able to pay high amount of charge for clean water especially old age people, as they do not have any income source. Thus, it is the biggest responsibilty of the government to provide free water for them.
On the other hand, there are some points to support another notion of why it is not vital to supply clean water in every home, as in this modern world, people have their own electronic gadgets which can help them to purify the water in a few minutes.
To put it into a nutshell, after scrutinizing aforemetioned points, it can be concluded that clean water should be free for those people who do not have any income sources such as old age people. Hence, this will have an impact on our upcoming generation and this will lead to a better future.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
The response discusses both the case for free water and a counterargument, and the conclusion gives a position: water should be free for people without income. However, the task asks whether every home should receive a free supply, and this narrower conclusion does not clearly answer that question for all households. The opposing point about electronic purification gadgets is also not fully explained: having a purifier does not establish that households can access safe water or should pay for it. The tax and older-people arguments are relevant, but they remain general and are not supported with a specific example or fuller explanation. State your position clearly in the introduction and develop reasons that directly address universal free provision.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The essay has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting contrasting views, and a conclusion. Sequencing phrases such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “To put it into a nutshell” help signal the stages of the argument. Overall, the reader can follow the main direction. However, the progression is sometimes mechanical, and the second body paragraph is much less developed than the first, so the contrast is not balanced. Some links between ideas are unclear: the sentence about taxes and “basic human right” combines several points without showing their relationship, while the reference to “this” in the conclusion is vague. Use clearer links between claims and explanations, and make each paragraph develop one central point.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
There is an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “basic human right,” “government,” “purify,” and “income source.” The writer also attempts more formal expressions such as “imperative” and “scrutinizing,” showing an effort to vary word choice. However, some choices are inaccurate or unnatural, including “the way of living,” “opposite to it,” and “the biggest responsibility,” and several spelling errors—“debetable,” “responsibilty,” and “aforemetioned”—reduce accuracy. Some phrases are also unnecessarily elaborate, such as “upcoming paragraphs” and “current scenarios.” Aim for precise, natural collocations and check spelling; simpler wording is often more effective than formal-sounding phrases used inaccurately.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “because,” “as,” and “which.” This allows the writer to explain reasons and contrast viewpoints, and the main meaning is generally understandable. Some grammatical errors remain. For example, “Ever since 20th century took place” is not a well-formed time expression, and “people are paying a large amount of tax … for their basic human right, which are” has problems with article use and agreement. The long sentence beginning “First and foremost” also joins several ideas in a way that makes the structure difficult to follow. Work on accurate articles, singular/plural agreement, and sentence boundaries, and divide long sentences when they contain multiple claims.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.