Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Clean water is a basic huma rights therefore everyone should have a free water supply. this eassy will strongly agree with this view.

fristly, we need water in our Daily lives. even we can't imagine our life without it. cleanwater is essential for helathy life and to protect various kind disease, people need safe drinking water for, cooking, cleaning and personal hygiene. If government charges people for Their basic need low income family's may straggle to afford sufficient cleaning water. As a result they might realy on unsafe sourcees. wich could lead a serious health issues. Another important reason is that free water provisos can reduce financial pressure on disadvantage households.

However providing unlimited water free of chagre may encourage unnecessary consumption and waste. To address this issue government could introduce a system in wich reasonable amount of water chagres for feee.this would ensure Both affordability and responsible consume.

in conclusion, i firmly believe that every households should receive a basic supply of clean water without charge. and for right amount of used government should introduced strict regulations.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You state a clear position in the opening—“will strongly agree”—and return to it in the conclusion. Your reasons are relevant: clean water supports health and hygiene, while charges could burden low-income families and push them towards unsafe sources. However, the response addresses the issue only partially because these points are asserted rather than explained with specific examples or fuller reasoning. The proposal that a “reasonable amount” should be free is also not clearly defined, and the conclusion’s reference to regulations does not explain how they would work. The response is 178 words, below the required 250, so there is limited space to develop the argument. Extend each main point and clarify how your proposed system would protect access while discouraging waste.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall arrangement: an introduction, a paragraph supporting free access, a qualification about waste, and a conclusion. This gives the reader a basic progression from your position to a practical concern. Linking expressions such as “Firstly,” “As a result,” “However,” and “In conclusion” help signal these stages. At times, though, the connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “Another important reason” introduces a related point without showing how it differs from the preceding health argument, and the final sentence beginning “and for right amount” is difficult to connect to the conclusion. Use clearer topic sentences and explain the relationship between each reason and your proposal; ensure each paragraph develops one main idea.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “personal hygiene,” “low income families,” “financial pressure,” and “unnecessary consumption.” These choices show an attempt to discuss both access and responsible use. However, the range is limited, and frequent spelling errors or inaccurate word forms make some phrases difficult to understand, such as “cleanwater,” “straggle,” “sourcees,” and “provisos.” Some collocations are also awkward: “kind disease,” “cleaning water,” and “responsible consume” do not express your meaning naturally. Aim to check spelling carefully and learn common combinations such as “prevent diseases,” “safe drinking water,” and “responsible water use.” More precise vocabulary would help you explain the policy and its effects.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, including a conditional idea: “If government charges people for Their basic need low income family's may…” This shows some effort to express cause and effect. However, the range of structures is limited, and errors in sentence formation, agreement, articles, and punctuation occur frequently enough to make parts difficult to follow. For example, “If government charges people…” needs a clearer subject and article, while “every households should receive” has a subject–verb agreement problem. The sentence about a free allowance is also structurally unclear, and several sentences begin with lowercase letters or run together. Practise building accurate complex sentences with “if,” “because,” and “which,” then check each sentence for a complete subject and verb.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.