Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Many people believe that access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore everyone should have a water supply that is free of charge. But in reality that is not the case. Many people all around the world do not have free access to clean water. I think having drinking water is a basic human right and we have to change the current situation.

In many southern countries there is a water shortage. Longe dry periodes in the summer and no infrastructur to clean the water make it hard to garante a clean water supply. There for, in many counties it is just not posible to have drinking water for every home. The poverty stops these countries from enableing free water supply for families. This is the reason why so many people can not have access to clean water for free. The state can not pay for the water. That is why the water access costs money.

This is a perible situation. Every human need water every single day to live a healfy and happy life. It should not be that the parents have to pay for water for there children. This is why every single home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge. The children can not pay for their own water. If the parents get sick so that they can not work and pay for the water, the childern have to suffer. That is why the state should provide free water.

In conclusion it can be hard to have free access to dinking water in every home. People need water to live and thats why water should be for free. Pour countries,that are located in a dry area, need support from rich nations to help providing free water.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you agree that households should receive water free of charge, and you give relevant reasons, especially the effect on children when parents cannot afford it. You also acknowledge practical barriers, such as water shortages and the cost of treatment, so the response addresses both the proposal and its challenges. However, some points are asserted rather than explained. For example, the claim that poverty prevents countries from providing free water would be stronger with a specific explanation of funding or a relevant example. The conclusion introduces support from richer nations, but this idea is not developed in the main discussion. Develop each key reason more fully and connect it directly to your position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. The paragraphs generally have clear purposes, moving from barriers to the case for free provision, and phrases such as “This is why” help show cause and effect. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes repetitive: several sentences repeat that people cannot access or pay for water without adding a new step to the argument. Some links are also mechanical, particularly repeated uses of “That is why” and “This is why.” The final reference to support from rich nations appears suddenly. Improve the flow by grouping related points, varying linking methods, and introducing or explaining ideas before they appear in the conclusion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main argument, including “water shortage,” “water supply,” “poverty,” and “provide free water.” However, the range is limited and several inaccurate spellings or word choices make the writing less clear and natural. Examples include “Longe dry periodes,” “infrastructur,” “garante,” and “perible situation”; these errors can distract the reader. Some phrases are also imprecise, such as “southern countries” and “the state can not pay for the water.” Build a more accurate set of topic vocabulary and check spelling carefully. More precise expressions for water scarcity, treatment facilities, public funding and affordability would help you explain the issue with greater clarity.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use mostly straightforward sentence patterns, with some attempts to connect ideas through clauses, as in “If the parents get sick so that they can not work and pay for the water, the childern have to suffer.” The main meaning is usually understandable, but grammatical errors recur and sometimes make relationships between ideas awkward. For example, “every human need water” has a subject–verb agreement error, while “the poverty stops these countries from enableing free water supply” has an incorrect grammatical pattern. There are also problems with articles, plurals and sentence punctuation, including the comma splice in “In conclusion it can be hard…” Practise accurate agreement and clause construction, and proofread punctuation while retaining some varied sentence forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.