Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The indispensable role of water in our contemporary life cannot be overlooked. For the survival of human beings, sterile and clean water is a fundamental requirement. Some believe that water supply should be free for everyone, but I partially agree with this statement and I will analyse both perspectives and provide my conclusion.

To begin with, providing free consumption of water is essential for maintaining a better health. Water is a basic requirement for household chores such as bathing, washing clothes and utensils. Moreover, according to science, water is necessary for blood supply, regulate the kidney function and make a oxygenated blood for whole body. As a result, contaminated water can also have a adverse effects including dysentry, flu like conditions. For example, in slum areas, the shortage or polluted water enhance the mortality and morbidity rates among children and new born. Thus, water is the only source, which can make them physically and mentally well being.

On the other hand, if supplying unlimited free water to individuals, then they using it as unnecessary such as washing cars, watering gardens and for swimming. Furthermore, uneven distribution of water can lead to water shortage. Consequently, higher authorities should provide them water as limited as possible, so they also know that natural resources are extremely valuable to survive and for young generations. For example, In Rajasthan, there is a scarcity of water and frequently experience droughts. Thus, government should supply limited water as necessitate and also charge money for excessive use.

To conclude, I partially agree that everyone should have free access of water. Although water fulfill the basic demands, restriction should be applied by government, so everyone can have water for daily routines and a balanced approach is therefore the most sensible conclusion.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction—“I partially agree”—and remains consistent in the conclusion. You address both the case for access to water, including health and household needs, and the concern that unlimited free supply could encourage waste. The examples of children affected by polluted water and drought in Rajasthan help make the discussion relevant. This fits a response that covers the task and supports its main ideas. To strengthen the development further, explain more precisely how free access could be guaranteed for essential household use while charging for excessive consumption. The claim that water is “the only source” of physical and mental well-being is also too broad; a more qualified explanation would make the argument more convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear overall progression: an introduction states your position, two body paragraphs present contrasting considerations, and the conclusion restates your view. Paragraphing is appropriate, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “On the other hand,” and “To conclude” make the stages easy to follow. You also use cause-and-effect links, including “As a result” and “Consequently,” to connect claims. At times, however, the links feel formulaic, and some references are not fully clear—for example, “they also know” does not identify precisely who “they” refers to. The relationship between limited free provision and charging for excessive use could also be connected more explicitly. More varied transitions and clearer referencing would make the progression smoother.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “contaminated water,” “shortage,” “uneven distribution,” and “scarcity,” and you attempt more formal expressions such as “mortality and morbidity rates.” These choices help communicate the main points, although some less common wording is inaccurate or unnatural. For instance, “free consumption of water” is less suitable than “free water supply,” while “make a oxygenated blood” and “as necessitate” do not express the intended meanings naturally. There are also spelling and word-choice slips, such as “dysentry” and “new born.” Aim for precise, natural collocations rather than choosing elaborate phrases; this will improve clarity while preserving the formal tone appropriate to the task.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including conditional reasoning (“if supplying unlimited free water…”) and subordinate clauses beginning with “Although.” The overall meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors recur and occasionally make sentences awkward. For example, “water is necessary for blood supply, regulate the kidney function” shifts from a noun phrase to a verb without a matching structure; “if supplying… then they using it” lacks a correctly formed conditional clause; and “water fulfill” has subject–verb disagreement. Articles and sentence construction also need attention in “make a oxygenated blood” and “Although water fulfill the basic demands.” Practise complete conditional patterns and check agreement, articles, and verb forms when editing. Greater accuracy across these structures would make your argument easier to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.