Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Clean water had a major contribution in healthy life of a person and is seen as a basic human right.Some people argues that a water suply that is provided to every home should be free of cost while other think that people should pay for it. I strongley agree with the view of having clean water in every house with no bill.

One one hand competely free water in each house of a country may have a huge financial burden on government as the state have to pay,wages to the workers involved in supplying water , fuel cost of the vehical of concerned department as well as the the process involved in making the water clean or filtered. Moreover free water may involves in reduction of importance of water. In addition to that it may leads to windup of other developents project as the goverment have to allucate more budget on it.

On the other hand regardless all the disadvatages of zero cost water for people Water is an important factor in a house. Cost on water in extra ecnomical pressure on individuals as they haveto pay every thing in house including rent, electricity, any many other bills. Free water is a big releaf for the residents of a country Futhermore water is is used in everything in msy helps people to save money like if they have enough water they can grow their own vegitables,fruits etc.

In conclusion the goverments should work on the ways and sources to supply water to every house without any cost.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you strongly support free household water, and the response considers both the financial burden on government and the benefit to residents. These points are relevant to the question, and the conclusion restates your view. However, the two sides are not developed equally. The government-cost argument lists expenses such as workers, fuel and water treatment, but does not explain why these costs should outweigh or be managed alongside the right to access water. Your supporting case is also broad: the pressure of household bills and the possibility of growing food are mentioned, but would be more convincing with a specific example or explanation of how free provision could be targeted or funded. Develop these ideas more fully and connect them directly to your position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two contrasting body paragraphs signposted by “On one hand” and “On the other hand,” and a conclusion. This makes your position and the broad direction of the argument easy to follow. Some connections, however, are mechanical or unclear. For example, “In addition to that” introduces another government-cost point without showing its relationship to the previous one, while “regardless all the disadvantages” does not clearly express the intended contrast. The sentence about water helping people save money moves quickly from household expenses to growing vegetables, so the link needs explaining. Use transitions selectively, clarify references, and organise each paragraph around a main point followed by its explanation or example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “basic human right,” “financial burden,” “budget,” and “economic pressure,” which helps communicate the main ideas. There are also attempts at more specific wording, such as “filtered” and “allocate.” However, spelling errors and inaccurate word forms are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause: examples include “suply,” “strongley,” “disadvatages,” and “allucate.” Some combinations are also unnatural, such as “water had a major contribution in healthy life” and “windup of other development project.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and check spelling carefully. A smaller number of well-chosen expressions used precisely will strengthen the argument more than repeated or uncertain phrasing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including a contrast between the costs to government and the benefits to households. The main message remains understandable, but errors in agreement, verb forms, articles and sentence construction occur across the response. For instance, “Some people argues” should use a plural verb, and “the state have to pay” needs agreement between the subject and verb. In “free water may involves,” the verb form is incorrect; the long opening list of costs also needs clearer punctuation and sentence boundaries. There are some run-on or incomplete constructions, particularly in the second body paragraph. Practise checking each sentence for a clear subject and verb, then use complex clauses only when their relationships are clear.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.