Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Nowadays, people required to access on clean water as a basic necessities for daily basis. I partly agree that every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge. However, I also believe that government should take this case as a consideration and to be discussed further.

On the one hand, citizens has paid taxes in some purchases. Furthermore, the government should be able to provide facility to certain citizens that obedient to the law of the country. In addition to that, to have access to clean water managed to a more healthy life. Water is a common needs that could help many aspects in human life. For instance, a clean water can be used for a wide variety of daily, domestic, agricultural, and domestic purposes. Moreover, it can supporting bodily functions of a human.

On the other hand, to access a clean water required a cost to maintain and the capability of ensuring the source of the water supply. Water supply businesses able to see this as an opportunity to provide every home an access to clean water in exchange with government in order to accomplish this target. Furthermore, government have the ability to examine this consideration due to society that not able to access this issue. As a result, it can caused other issues regarding this unfairness.

In conclusion, while I partly accept that every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge, I believe that government should take this into a consideration in order to ensure every citizens has treated fairly.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You give a partly agreeing position and address both sides, including the public-health value of clean water and the cost of maintaining supply. However, the position is not fully explained: the conclusion says the government should consider the issue, but does not clarify whether households should ultimately receive water free or how this would work. Several points remain unclear or unsupported, such as the claim that citizens who obey the law should receive facilities and the role of water businesses working “in exchange with government.” The response also falls short of the required 250 words: 235 words were counted, and 26 words copied from the prompt were excluded. Develop your reasons with a specific example and explain how costs could be funded while ensuring access for all.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting opposing considerations, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the broad direction. However, progression within paragraphs is uneven, and some links between ideas are difficult to follow. For example, the move from taxes to citizens who obey the law does not clearly explain how these points support free water. “Furthermore” and “In addition to that” also create a list-like effect rather than showing precise relationships. The conclusion repeats the position without resolving the tension between free provision and maintenance costs. Use clearer topic sentences and connect each supporting point explicitly to your argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “clean water,” “taxes,” “water supply,” “maintain,” and “bodily functions,” so the main subject is clear. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “a wide variety” and “ensuring the source.” However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or repetitive, sometimes making meaning unclear. For instance, “a common needs” and “in exchange with government” do not express the intended ideas naturally, while “daily” and “domestic” are repeated in the same list. Aim for precise phrases such as “a basic necessity,” “in partnership with the government,” and “household uses.” Vary repeated terms and check that each phrase fits its context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “while,” “that,” and “in order to.” This gives the response some structural variety. However, errors occur frequently in basic sentence patterns and in the more complex attempts, and they can make the reader pause. Examples include “people required to access,” “citizens has paid,” “it can supporting,” and “it can caused”; these show problems with verb forms and subject–verb agreement. Articles and countability also need attention in phrases such as “a clean water” and “a common needs.” Practise building accurate subject–verb–object sentences first, then add subordinate clauses. Proofread each sentence for agreement, verb form, and article use.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.