Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Giving allowance to get fresh water is a basic and common human need. So, This fresh water must be supplied to every household which should be free of cost. I completely agree the statement because it is an responsiblity of the government to provide the facilities to the public without any issue. Moreover, In cities getting clean water is difficult helps improve the society.

The authorities should help the people who are in needs of clean water for some common needs like bathing, cooking and washing etc. Therefore, this basic can be sloved by having a rule to provide fresh water to the public. For example, In rural areas where they do not have any specific sources to get water they need to travel long distance to get fresh water. The govt should help by servicing with pipelines as a result their is no need of travelling for water.

In providing clean water free of charge guarantees a basic human right, improves public health, and protects low income families from finanical stress. The people who can not efford for the fresh water in cities should provide water free cost but reducing huge supply for places who overconsume. For example, having a limited supply for the places where the people can afford the price give more priority for the places who needed fresh water who cannot afford. As a result this leads to improvement in the social life in the cities.

In conclusion, Giving the free supply of water is an essensial need for all the human life. I beleive it would be a better idea to give free supply for the people who are in need also, the authorities should also have the responsiblity for this basic need.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the opening: you completely agree that households should receive water free of charge, and you return to this view in the conclusion. You give relevant reasons, including water’s role in daily needs, the difficulty of access in rural areas, public health, and financial pressure on low-income families. The rural example of travelling long distances helps make the issue concrete. However, some points are not fully explained, and the argument becomes less consistent when you suggest free water for people in need but reduced supply in places where people can afford to pay. Clarify whether you support a free basic supply for everyone or targeted assistance, then develop that policy and its practical implications more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, and the ideas generally move from basic needs to access and affordability. Linking expressions such as “Therefore,” “For example,” and “As a result” help show relationships between points. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. For instance, “Moreover, In cities getting clean water is difficult helps improve the society” does not clearly connect its ideas, and the shift from free water for all to prioritising people who cannot afford it is not signposted. Use clearer topic sentences and make each paragraph develop one main reason. Ensure pronouns and references, such as “this basic,” clearly identify the idea being discussed.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “basic human right,” “public health,” “low income families,” and “financial stress,” which helps communicate your main concerns. There are also attempts at more specific language, such as “pipelines” and “overconsume.” However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, including “Giving allowance to get fresh water,” “servicing with pipelines,” and “free cost.” Spelling errors such as “responsiblity,” “sloved,” “finanical,” and “efford” also reduce accuracy. Build a reliable set of phrases for discussing water access and public services, and check spelling and word forms carefully. More precise, natural phrasing would make your argument easier to follow.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a reason clause with “because,” a relative clause beginning “where,” and a result clause with “as a result.” The overall meaning is usually understandable, but some grammatical errors affect clarity. For example, “In cities getting clean water is difficult helps improve the society” combines clauses without a clear grammatical link, while “The people who can not efford for the fresh water in cities should provide water” has an unclear subject and verb relationship. There are also problems with articles, agreement and sentence boundaries, as in “it is an responsiblity” and the capitalisation after “So,”. Practise forming complete clauses and checking subject–verb relationships, articles and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.