Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

access to clean drinking water is a fundamental human right , and every household must have reliable water supply without and charges.i completely agree with this as nowadays the water is polluted by industrial wastes and other things. so governments should take some steps to give the supply of clean water to everyone without any cost, as it was there right.

water is essential of human survival, maintaing good health and preventing diseases. the first reason is that in the society it is too difficult for everyone to afford clean water. it is basic need which is used for cooking, drinking, cleaning and many more. if a person cannot able to pay for the clean water they uses the polluted water which causes the diseases. for example in some urban areas there is no access to clean water which result into increases the rate of chronic problems.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

Your position is clear: you completely agree that households should receive clean water without charge, and you give relevant reasons, including its importance for health and the difficulty some people face affording it. However, the response addresses the task only partially because these points are briefly stated rather than explained or supported with a developed example. The reference to urban areas is too general to show how free provision would help, and you do not consider how such a service might be funded or managed. The response is also 103 words below the required minimum, which leaves too little space to develop your argument. Extend each reason with explanation and a specific, relevant example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The ideas are grouped in a broadly understandable order: you state your view, then explain why water matters and why affordability is an issue. Linking expressions such as “the first reason” and “for example” help signal the relationship between points. However, the response has only two paragraphs and does not develop a clear progression from one reason to the next; the final example is introduced but not fully connected to the claim about free household supply. Some links are also awkward, such as “if a person cannot able to pay,” which makes the relationship harder to follow. Use separate paragraphs for distinct reasons, and make each one follow a clear claim–explanation–example sequence.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “fundamental human right,” “clean water,” “industrial wastes,” “preventing diseases,” and “chronic problems.” This gives the response enough basic language to communicate its main argument. However, the range is limited and several expressions are imprecise or unnatural, such as “without and charges,” “essential of human survival,” and “the rate of chronic problems.” Spelling and word-form errors, including “maintaining” and “right” where “rights” is intended, also reduce accuracy. Build a more precise range for discussing access and public services, and check collocations and spelling so your meaning is expressed naturally.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences with reasons and conditions, for example, “If a person cannot able to pay for the clean water they uses the polluted water.” This shows an effort to connect ideas, but the range remains limited and errors are frequent enough to make some sentences difficult to read. Examples include “every household must have reliable water supply,” “water is essential of human survival,” and “which result into increases the rate,” where articles, verb forms, agreement, and sentence construction need correction. Capitalisation and punctuation are also inconsistent, particularly at sentence beginnings. Practise accurate simple sentence patterns first, then add subordinate clauses while checking subject–verb agreement and articles.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.