Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

No organism in this earth can survive without water. Having contamination free water is a basic human right. It is often argued that, every home should be provided with a free water supply. In my opinion, a minimum charge should be deducted from the citizens to ensure smooth production procedure and to reduce pressure on national economy.

To start with, due to continuous water pollution, the process of cleaning water is now a costly procedure. Water supply managements of countries have to spend a lot of money buying purification items and installing purification plants. Huge manpower and continuous observation are needed to ensure the continuity of the cleaning process of water. As a consequence, a huge amount of budget is needed to run the whole system as well as supplying pure water to the inhabitants. For instance, the water supply management authority of Bangladesh (WASA) spend a huge amount of money on water flitration plants. Excessive cost of water treatment plants create pressures on national economy. Free water supply process forces goverment to collect money from other economic sectors to pay off the costs which creates the imbalance between economic sectors.

To address this issue, the government should deduct a charge from residents to meet the production cost of this whole system. As a result, the purification process can be run with the money collected from citizens and that will reduce pressure on other economic sectors. Inhabitants can also raise questions if they find any fault in this process as they are paying money for it. For example, a monthly water bill is collected from homes in cities of Bangladesh and that helps to run WASA.

In conclusion, pure water should be provided in cities with a charge to avoid pressure on other economic sectors.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you disagree with free household water and support a charge to fund treatment and reduce pressure on public finances. You address the main issue and give relevant support, including the costs of purification and the example of Bangladesh’s WASA. This is a solid response, but some points are more fully explained than others. In particular, the claim that paying customers can question faults is introduced but not developed, and the essay does not consider the opposing view that charging for an essential resource could limit access for poorer households. To strengthen the response, explain how a modest fee could be balanced with subsidies or free basic provision, and extend each example to show how it supports your position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear overall progression: the introduction states your view, the body paragraphs explain the costs and propose a charge, and the conclusion restates your position. Paragraphing is appropriate, and signposts such as “To start with,” “To address this issue,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. The reasoning generally moves in a logical order from treatment costs to funding. Some links, however, are a little mechanical, and the relationship between ideas could be made more explicit—for example, the point about residents being able to raise questions is not clearly connected to the main argument about funding. Use a wider range of natural transitions and make the links between each claim and its supporting example more precise.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “water pollution,” “purification plants,” “production cost,” and “economic sectors,” which allows you to explain the issue clearly. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “ensure the continuity” and “imbalance between economic sectors.” However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, including “contamination free water,” “water supply managements,” and “deduct a charge.” Spelling slips such as “flitration” and “goverment” also reduce accuracy. Aim for more natural combinations and precise terms, such as “safe drinking water,” “water authorities,” and “charge residents a fee.” Proofreading would help preserve the clarity of your ideas.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including cause-and-effect structures with “As a consequence” and “As a result,” and a conditional clause in “if they find any fault.” Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, so the errors do not generally obstruct understanding. Some grammatical inaccuracies remain: “every home should be provided” follows a comma after “argued” that is not needed, “WASA spend” has a subject–verb agreement error, and “Excessive cost … create pressures” has number agreement problems. There are also issues with articles and sentence construction, as in “in this earth” and “Free water supply process forces goverment.” Review agreement, article use, and punctuation, while continuing to use varied sentence structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.