Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Water is the basic human need for life. To provide water without any charges to everyone is their basic human rights. I agree with that everybody should have to get water without paying for it.

From my perspective, with out water and fresh air no one can survive. To charge people for water and other stuff which is very essential for livingbeings are not right. All people have rights to get their basic living stuff without paying for it.

Now a days many entrepreneurs have establish their companies of pure water. Because of pollution increases people need to take pure water without any impurities. Water pollution is the main cause of this business. Without water no body will survive. Governments are also supporting these businesses because these businesses are earning much profit just by selling water.

Polluted water is main cause of many diseases like cancer, kidney stone and kidney failure, liver problems and many other kind of diseases like that. Instead of overcoming the water pollution and all these diseases government is supporting such businesses which is selling people pure water. To overcome this problem of water pollution government should have to take action against industries and those people who are polluting our rivers and canals. Government should also setup water purifiyers to many areas of cities from where people gets free pure water without paying any thing.

In conclusion, pure and fresh water is the basic rights of living things. Also governments should have to take action against people who makes our water impure.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you agree that households should receive water without charge, and you give relevant reasons, including water’s necessity for survival and the health risks of pollution. You also propose government action, such as addressing polluting industries and installing purification facilities. These points address the topic, but they do not all answer the central question equally fully. In particular, the discussion of private water companies and pollution shifts attention from how a free household supply should be funded or delivered. The health claims are listed rather than explained, and the conclusion repeats your view without adding a final justification. Develop the practical implications of free provision and support each main reason with a clearer explanation or example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, paragraphs about water access and pollution, and a concluding statement. The ideas are generally relevant and can be followed, with transitions such as “From my perspective” and “In conclusion” signalling movement between sections. However, progression within the body is sometimes repetitive: the claim that nobody can survive without water appears several times, while the relationship between free household supply, bottled-water businesses, and pollution is not always made explicit. Some linking phrases, including “Instead of overcoming,” introduce a contrast without clearly explaining the connection. Organise each body paragraph around one distinct reason, then use clear references and transitions to show how its evidence supports your position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate your main ideas, including “water pollution,” “impurities,” “diseases,” and “purifiyers.” There are also attempts to express more specific concepts, such as “basic human rights” and “water supply.” However, the range is limited by repeated words such as “water,” “government,” and “businesses,” and several choices or forms are inaccurate: “living stuff” is informal and imprecise, “pure water” is repeated where “safe drinking water” would be more natural, and “purifiyers” is misspelled. Some phrases, such as “water pollution is the main cause of this business,” are difficult to interpret. Build a more precise set of topic collocations and check spelling and word forms during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences with subordinate clauses, for example, “Because of pollution increases people need to take pure water.” This shows an effort to vary sentence structure, but control is inconsistent, and errors sometimes make relationships between ideas unclear. Examples include “everybody should have to get,” “many entrepreneurs have establish,” and “government should have to take action”; these involve faulty verb forms or unnecessary modal constructions. Agreement and sentence structure also need attention in “these businesses is earning” and “people who makes our water impure.” Articles and plurals are inconsistent as well. Practise forming accurate subject–verb patterns and past participles, and revise longer sentences into clear clauses before adding complexity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.