Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In the age of ai where human have acccess to almost everything, i can tell that the the last thing we should think about is water,because why would anyone in charge think that water is not crucial and that citizens have to pay to get it,in fact every house should has accesse to it no matter what, and this is for many important reasons.

first of all, water is a natural resource where human has no hand at preducing it , so that they don't have the right to surpress it from others or to decide what to do with it, in fact if there are anyone in charge they can only help to educate everyone about how to preserve and protect it from wasting, for example in countries where it does't always rain, it's bette for scientests to enlighten peopl about the importance of water preservation through meetings and tvs...etc and by these educational meetings people will be aware of its importance and they will do whatever it takes to save it.

on the other hand, people no matter what their bachground is, needs water in their every day activities, thus they have the right to get access to it free of charge, because citizens are already paying taxes to the governement for other facilities, and getting clean water at the end of the day is the least the country should provide to them.

to conclude, water as a natural recource every human being on earth deserves to get the access to it without having to spend any cash on it.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you agree that every household should receive clean water without charge, and you give relevant reasons, including water’s importance for daily activities and the role of taxes. The response also addresses the idea of water as a natural resource. However, some points are less fully developed than others. The example about educating people in countries with little rainfall supports conservation, but it does not directly explain why household water should be free. The claim that people have no right to control a natural resource also needs clearer reasoning, since water supply requires treatment and infrastructure. Develop these links and acknowledge practical considerations, such as funding, while maintaining your position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction states your view, the body presents reasons, and a conclusion restates your position. Connectors such as “first of all,” “on the other hand,” and “to conclude” help signal the stages of the argument. However, the progression within the first body paragraph is not always clear: the discussion moves from natural resources to government education and then to conservation, without consistently linking these ideas back to free household supply. The long opening sentence also combines several points, making the argument harder to follow. Use clearer paragraph development, with each paragraph centred on one reason, and make references and transitions more precise rather than relying mainly on formulaic signposts.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “natural resource,” “preserve,” “citizens,” “taxes,” and “free of charge,” which allows you to communicate your main ideas. There are also attempts at more formal expressions, such as “water preservation” and “educate everyone.” However, spelling errors and imprecise or unnatural word choices are noticeable, for example “acccess,” “preducing,” “surpress,” and “enlighten people.” Some phrases are also awkward, including “has no hand at producing it” and “get the access to it.” These issues reduce the accuracy and naturalness of the vocabulary, although the overall meaning remains understandable. Check spelling carefully and learn common collocations for public services and water supply.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, using structures such as “because citizens are already paying taxes” and “where human has no hand at…” to explain reasons. The main argument is generally understandable, but errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence boundaries occur across the response. For example, “every house should has” should be “every house should have,” and “people … needs water” should be “people … need water.” The opening sentence is a run-on, with several clauses joined by commas, and the final sentence has an awkward construction around “deserves to get the access.” Aim for shorter, accurately punctuated sentences, and check subject–verb agreement and verb forms before adding more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.