Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is often argued that, every person has right to have a free access to a clean water from the state. I completely agree with this view because clean water is essential for human survival and It reduces financial pressure on low income families along with equality and social justice.

The primary reason why I agree with this view is that every individual needs clean water for drinking, cooking and daily activities. Nobody should be deprived of this basic necessity because of financial difficulties. Providing free water ensures that everyone can meet their basic needs. For example, Poor families can access clean drinking water without worrying about monthly bills. Another important point is that free water improves public health. In other words, free access to clean water encourages better hygiene and sanitation because contaminated water can cause serious diseases. As a result, this can reduce the spread of waterborne disease.

Furthermore, it reduces the financial pressure on low income families and it provides another reason to support my position. This is mainly because Many poor households struggle to afford basic necessities and paying monthly water bills can increase their financial burden. Consequently, free water allows them to spend their limited income on food, education and other essential needs. For instance, Families with limited income can use their savings to purchase nutritious food instead of paying water bills. In addition, it promotes equality and social justice and it is worth considering as both wealthy and disadvantaged people who deserve equal access to essential resources and access to clean water should not depend on a person's financial status. Therefore, free water supply can reduce inequality and create a healthier society.

In concusion, I completely agree that free water supply is the main right for every human being becuase it promotes the equality and social justice, reduces the financial burden and clean water is essential for human survival.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction to the conclusion, and you address the central question by arguing that water should be free because it is essential, supports public health, and protects low-income households. The examples about families using savings for food and avoiding water bills help make the financial argument relevant. This is a well-supported response overall. However, some points are asserted rather than fully explored: for example, the claim that free water promotes equality could explain more precisely how universal provision would work or why it is preferable to targeted assistance. The public-health point is also brief. Developing these implications further, while avoiding broad claims such as “create a healthier society” without explanation, would make the argument more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion, with each body paragraph focused on related reasons. Linking expressions such as “For example,” “As a result,” and “Furthermore” help signal the progression. This gives the reader a coherent line of argument. At times, however, cohesion is mechanical or repetitive: “Another important point,” “Furthermore,” and “In addition” introduce points in a similar way, while the second body paragraph combines financial pressure and equality in a long sequence. The phrase “and it provides another reason to support my position” repeats the paragraph’s purpose rather than advancing the argument. Use clearer links between claims and explanations, and separate distinct ideas where needed.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “basic necessity,” “contaminated water,” “sanitation,” “financial burden,” and “social justice.” These choices communicate the main ideas and show some ability to use more formal language. However, several word-choice and collocation problems reduce precision, such as “free access to a clean water,” “waterborne disease” when referring generally to diseases, and “the main right” in the conclusion. There are also spelling and capitalisation slips, including “concusion,” “becuase,” and unnecessary capitals in “Poor” and “Many.” Aim for more natural combinations such as “access to clean water” and “a fundamental human right,” and proofread carefully for spelling and consistent capitalisation.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including reason clauses with “because,” a conditional structure (“Nobody should be deprived… because of financial difficulties”), and result clauses introduced by “Consequently” and “As a result.” Meaning remains clear throughout. Some grammatical errors nevertheless occur. The opening has article and noun-phrase problems in “every person has right to have a free access to a clean water,” and the conclusion contains the awkward construction “I completely agree that free water supply is the main right.” Capitalisation within sentences is also inconsistent, as in “It” and “Many”; punctuation after the introductory phrase “It is often argued that” is unnecessary. Review articles, countability, and sentence punctuation, then check that each sentence expresses its main clause cleanly.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.