Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Most people argue that every home should access to clean water without paying any charges as a basic human rights. I completely agree with this statement because the water is a very important to survive lifes.

The government should provide a clean water to every house to save their people. Firstly, the water plays a significant roles in human lives because without drinking water nobody can save.Additinaly, it is very useful in humans daily life like to clean body, wash clothes, animals (cattles) and so on. For example, according to constitution of Nepal, 2015, there is provisioned about every individual has right to get a clean water without any charges. Therefore, the government should makke policies about the regular supply of clean water with free of charge.

Furthermore, those who are involve in agriculture they need also regular supply of water in their cultivate lands for irrigation as without proper irrigation the farmer cannot grow more crops or vegetables. Moreover, the government should also test the water bbefoe supplying at homes because the water can contain harmful chemicals like potassium and arsenic which are also main causes of spreading various water-related diseases.

In conlusion, the water plays a vital role in every living things such as to drink, clean body, wah clothes and so on. Meanwhile, it is more important for irrigation in the cultivated land. Therefore, I strongly agree for access to clean water is a basic human right and every home should have a regular water supply that is free of charge.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear from the introduction (“I completely agree”) and conclusion, and you give relevant reasons: water is essential for survival and daily hygiene, while irrigation supports farming. The reference to Nepal’s constitution also provides a specific example. However, the agricultural point is not fully connected to the claim that household water should be free, and the discussion of water testing introduces safety without explaining how it supports free provision. Develop these links and explain how the government could ensure reliable access. The response is 245 words, so it is five words below the required minimum; the nine words copied from the prompt are not counted. This shortfall, together with some under-developed ideas, limits how fully the task is addressed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. The ideas generally progress from water’s importance in daily life to agriculture and water safety, and signposts such as “Firstly,” “Furthermore” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “Moreover” introduces water testing, which is related to clean water but not clearly linked to the preceding point about irrigation. The conclusion repeats several examples rather than drawing the argument together. Use linking phrases to show the precise relationship between each reason and your position, and make references such as “those who are involve in agriculture” more direct and clear.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “basic human right,” “regular supply,” “irrigation,” “harmful chemicals” and “water-related diseases.” These choices make the main subject clear, and there are attempts to use more specific terms. However, the range is limited in places, with repeated use of “water,” “important” and “clean,” and several inaccurate word choices or collocations affect naturalness. Examples include “save their people,” “in their cultivate lands” and “free of charge” after “with.” Spelling errors such as “Additinaly,” “makke” and “conlusion” are also noticeable. Build a wider set of accurate phrases for access, supply and public health, and check spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a reason clause (“because the water is…”) and a conditional structure (“as without proper irrigation…”). The overall meaning is usually understandable, but some grammatical errors remain and occasionally make sentences difficult to follow. For example, “every home should access” is missing a grammatical construction, while “the water plays a significant roles” has an agreement error. Articles and plurals are also inconsistent in “provide a clean water” and “every living things.” Punctuation is missing in “nobody can save.Additinaly,” and some long sentences need clearer clause boundaries. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement, articles and sentence punctuation while retaining your attempts at complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.