Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Availability of clean water is a basic human right. Hence, all the houses should have a water supply that is provided free of cost. I totally agree; clean water is a basic human right, and every resident deserves to get clean water free of cost.
Water plays an important role; every living being requires water to survive. If the water is polluted, these bacteria will damage their bodies. In our society everybody is not getting clean water, which is affecting their overall health. If humans don't drink filtered water, it will damage their gut health, liver, and other body parts.
Slum areas are specifically targeted in these conditions; they don't get filtered water, this affects their own health, and it is passed down to their children. If you look at the data, waterborne diseases are significantly spread across slum areas rather than the civilized colonies.
As mentioned earlier, water is the basic necessity of any organism, due to which water should be provided free of cost. Water shouldn't be charged according to a person's financial condition or their background. If water is supplied equally without cost in all the regions, then every household would get the same type of water. If the water is not segregated according to the financial conditions, everyone will get the same water, due to which problems related to the water quality or quantity will be solved more efficiently.
In conclusion, clean and filtered water should be circulated free of cost to all the humans. Mankind has polluted and damaged the water quality, so it's our duty to clean and provide filtered water to all the living beings.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
Your position is clear from the introduction: “I totally agree,” and the conclusion consistently supports free access to clean water. You give relevant reasons, including the health effects of polluted water and the unequal impact on people in slum areas. However, these points are not developed equally: the claims about damage to the gut and liver and about waterborne diseases in slums would be more convincing with explanation or a specific example. The argument that equal, free supply would solve quality and quantity problems is also asserted rather than demonstrated. To strengthen the response, explain how free provision would be funded and maintained, or address the concern that charging may be needed to prevent waste.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure, moving from your position to health concerns, unequal access, and a conclusion. Paragraphs generally group related ideas, and phrases such as “As mentioned earlier” help signal a connection. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes repetitive: the final body paragraph repeats that water is a basic necessity and that it should be free without adding much new reasoning. Some links are also unclear, as in “If the water is not segregated according to the financial conditions,” where the relationship to equal access is difficult to follow. Build each paragraph around one distinct claim, then explain its consequence and support it with an example; use referencing and transitions more precisely.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “basic human right,” “polluted,” “waterborne diseases,” and “financial condition,” so the main ideas are understandable. There is some repetition of “free of cost,” “water,” and “health,” which limits the range and makes parts of the argument sound less precise. A few choices are also unnatural or imprecise: “civilized colonies” is not an appropriate contrast with slum areas, and “circulated” does not naturally describe supplying water to homes. Aim for more accurate collocations and vary repeated terms where the meaning allows. For example, you could refer to “low-income communities” and “a reliable municipal supply,” while keeping claims about health specific and carefully worded.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You use both simple statements and longer sentences with clauses, such as “If the water is polluted, these bacteria will damage their bodies.” Most of the meaning remains clear, but some sentence structures and punctuation need more control. In “Slum areas are specifically targeted in these conditions; they don't get filtered water, this affects their own health,” the comma joins independent clauses incorrectly; separate the ideas or use a conjunction. The sentence beginning “If the water is not segregated…” is also difficult to follow because its conditional structure is not clearly completed. Review sentence boundaries and make pronoun references explicit. More consistently controlled complex sentences would help you express cause and effect without obscuring your point.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.