Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is the basic fundamental right of human beings to have free access of clean and safe water. I disagree with the statement that supply of clean water to every household should be made entirely free of cost, as this might lead to huge expenditure of public funds and wastage of the resource.

Though it is the birth right of a human to have access of all natural resources like air and water, but making clean water available to every household with proper infrastruture and maintainenceis a financially expensive task. Spending funds for supplying of clean water to every corner of the city is not a right decison in terms of investment. Charging for the same service can be more beneficial to the government, as the excess funds can be invested in other resources like education, transport, healthcare and other developments.

Secondly, unlimited supply of clean water without paying a price might result in over consumption and wastage of water. As there is no financial expense attached to it, consumers might have the tendency to use clean water for unnecessary purposes. For example, using clean water for laundry and shower, leaving the tap open for hours, etc.

In conclusion, supply of clean water can be made accessible to every household but must not be made entirely free.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you disagree with making household water entirely free, and you give two relevant reasons—public expenditure and possible waste. The conclusion restates this view, so the response addresses the question. However, the reasons are not developed equally: the point about public funds is broad, while the examples of leaving taps open and using water for laundry support the waste argument more concretely. The response also contains 217 words, below the required 250, which limits the space available to explain your reasoning and provide relevant examples. To strengthen the response, explain how charges could be structured while protecting access for low-income households, and develop a specific example or consequence for each main point.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction states your position, two body paragraphs present separate reasons, and a conclusion summarises your view. The sequence is easy to follow, and signposts such as “Secondly” and “In conclusion” help identify the stages of the argument. Cohesion is sometimes mechanical, however, and the first body paragraph begins with a long concession before reaching its main point. The relationship between charging households and funding other public services could also be explained more explicitly. Improve progression by making each paragraph’s main claim clear at the start, then linking its explanation and example directly to that claim. More precise referencing and a wider range of transitions would make the connections feel less formulaic.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “public funds,” “over consumption,” “infrastructure,” and “financially expensive.” These choices communicate the main ideas, and the examples of household water use are relevant. Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, such as “access of clean and safe water,” “birth right,” and “right decision in terms of investment.” There are also spelling and spacing errors, including “infrastruture,” “maintainenceis,” and “decison.” These do not prevent understanding, but they reduce precision and control. Aim to learn common word partnerships and proofread carefully; for example, use “access to clean water,” “a basic human right,” and “a sound investment decision.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, and most of the argument remains understandable. For instance, the sentence beginning “Charging for the same service can be more beneficial…” expresses a clear cause-and-effect idea, while the example sentence gives specific uses of water. Some grammatical errors remain. In “Though it is the birth right …, but making clean water available…,” the concessive clause is incorrectly paired with “but”; use either “Although …, making…” or “It is true that …, but…”. The phrase “leaving the tap open for hours” also needs a parallel structure with the preceding examples. Review clause construction, articles, and sentence punctuation, while continuing to use complex forms accurately.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.