Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
It is commonly argued by a few individuals that clean water is a basic right. so every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge. This essay will discuss why I partially agree to this proposition and my following explanations will justify my notions.
On the one hand, the main reason for providing clean water free of charge is that water is essential in every day life because people need water for drinking, cooking and so on. In addition, if there is charge on water than poor people will face many difficulties to pay for it. Another stupendous reason is that providing free water supply will help to eradicate the diseases caused by contaminated water. therefore, government should ensure that every home should have a supply of water that is free of charge.
On the other hand, There are some reasons that supply of water should not be completely free of charge. firstly, people will use clean water in a careless manner because they do not have to pay for it. Moreover, clean water is a limited resource so government should not provide unlimited water free of charge. there should be a reasonable charge on the supply of water so that people will use it in limited way.
In conclusion, although clean water is basic human right to be provided free of charge to every individual, a small amount of fee on the supply of water ensure careful use of water without wasting it as it is a limited nature resource.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You present a relevant, partially agreeing position and address both sides: free access supports basic needs and poorer households, while charging may discourage waste. However, the position is not fully consistent: the introduction says you “partially agree,” whereas the conclusion says a fee should be charged without clearly defining what should remain free. The points are also brief and general; for example, the claim that free water would eradicate diseases needs explanation or a specific example. The response is 242 words, below the required 250, and 13 words copied from the prompt were not counted. Develop your reasoning with a concrete example and clarify whether a basic quantity should be free while excess use is charged.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, two contrasting body paragraphs signposted by “On the one hand” and “On the other hand,” and a conclusion. This makes the main line of argument easy to follow. You also use linking expressions such as “In addition” and “Moreover.” To make the progression more natural and less formulaic, connect each supporting point more explicitly to the central position and explain how the two sides lead to your conclusion. Some transitions are mechanically placed, and the conclusion introduces the idea of a “small amount of fee” without first establishing a clear distinction between essential and excessive use. Consistent paragraph-initial capitalization would also make the presentation more polished.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
Your vocabulary is sufficient to communicate the main ideas, including “contaminated water,” “limited resource,” and “reasonable charge.” You also attempt less common expressions such as “eradicate” and “stupendous.” However, some choices are inaccurate or unnatural: “stupendous reason” is an unsuitable collocation, “every day life” should be expressed as “everyday life,” and “limited nature resource” is not a natural phrase. Repetition of “water,” “free of charge,” and “supply” also limits flexibility. Aim for precise, natural collocations rather than inserting impressive-sounding words, and use alternatives such as “access to safe drinking water,” “water provision,” and “scarce natural resource” where appropriate.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You use both simple statements and some complex structures, including clauses with “because,” “if,” and “although,” so the argument is generally understandable. However, errors recur in sentence construction and punctuation. For example, “if there is charge on water than poor people will face” needs a more accurate conditional pattern, and “a small amount of fee … ensure” has an article and subject–verb agreement problem. The final sentence also lacks a clear grammatical connection between the fee and careful use. Capitalization after full stops is inconsistent, as in “so” and “therefore.” Practise accurate conditional sentences and check articles, agreement, and sentence boundaries while retaining your attempts at complex forms.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.