Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays, it is often argued that government should invest on free clean water supply in every house, as it is one of the basic human right. I completely agree with this view point because it improves individuals life-style and reduces several diseases, which are essential factors that contribute to better health.

The primary rationale behind this agreement is that free water supply can develops peoples lifestyle. This is mainly because when people do not have to worry about their basic need, they can focus on other essential purpose such as health, education and transport. For instance, if a poor person has a free access of clean water they can save this money and use it one their children's education or other necessary purchases. As a result, people can save money and give a better future for their children. Moreover, sufficient water offers people to wash their clothes or dishes regularly. Therefore, it is evident that free access of water plays a pivotal role one in better and clean life style.

Another compelling reason to support this view is that it reduce health problems. This is because dirty water or insufficient water can lead to several diseases. Consequently, they become unhealthy and sick. a clear example is that children or old people may infected by water disease such as cholera lack of clean water. Overall, this further demonstrates why access of clean water is essential.

In conclusion, I firmly agree that authorities should provide sufficient water. this is because it offers healthy and clean lifestyle, both of which ensure long term benefits for poor communities.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the opening—“I completely agree”—and remains consistent in the conclusion. You give two relevant reasons: free water could ease financial pressure on poorer households, and clean water can reduce illness. The examples about spending savings on children’s education and diseases such as cholera help support these points. This meets the task well, but the development is uneven: the health argument is brief, and the link between free provision and improved health could be explained more fully. The prompt concerns whether every home should receive water free of charge; clarify whether you mean all households or prioritising those unable to pay. More precise explanation and fuller support would make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion. The progression from financial benefits to health benefits is easy to follow, and signposts such as “The primary rationale,” “Another compelling reason,” and “In conclusion” make the organisation visible. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical because several sentences rely on formulaic links such as “This is mainly because,” “As a result,” and “Therefore.” Some references are also unclear: “they become unhealthy and sick” does not identify precisely who “they” refers to, and “this” in the conclusion could refer to more than one idea. Use a wider range of linking methods and make references explicit to improve flow.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “basic human right,” “sufficient water,” “diseases,” and “pivotal role.” These choices communicate the main ideas, and attempts at more formal phrasing show some ambition. However, several word-choice and collocation errors reduce naturalness, such as “invest on,” “free access of water,” “offers people to wash,” and “water disease.” There are also awkward or inaccurate forms, including “peoples lifestyle” and “one in better and clean life style.” These do not prevent understanding, but they limit precision and fluency. Focus on common collocations and accurate word forms, for example “invest in,” “access to clean water,” and “waterborne diseases.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “diseases, which are essential factors” and a conditional example beginning “if a poor person has…”. The overall meaning is generally understandable, but some errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries remain. Examples include “free water supply can develops,” “it reduce health problems,” and “children or old people may infected,” where the verb forms are not controlled. Missing or incorrect articles appear in “one of the basic human right,” while “a clear example” begins a sentence without a capital letter. Check subject–verb agreement and verb patterns, and proofread punctuation and articles. More accurate complex sentences would strengthen control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.