Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is argued that access to clean water is a fundamental right of every human being that should be available to them free of cost. I partially agree with this perspective because water is crucial for the survival of individuals, but the purification process might cost too much for some countries.

Clean water is essential for everybody in order to live on the planet. In other words, nowadays, due to lack of clean resources people may have to face diverse kind of issues such as disease, starvation, and many more. Therefore, every human being need to have drinkable water without any charge, so they can surive in this world. The prime example of this is Africa, where many people does not have access to clean drinkable water, and the water that is clean is being sold as a luxury item.

Admittedly, purifying water is an intesively hard and costly process that is why many nations unable to afford it. Some countries are so poor that they may have no money to provide access to this precious refined water resource free of cost to their citizens. As a result, the government might charge some price on it to purchase, but some people may unable to afford the purified water because of monetary reasons. For instance, setting up the machinery for purification of water is so expensive that some governments may impose a tax on refined water.

In conclusion, although purified water is a basic necessity of every individual, many nations cannot afford to provide it free because of monetary reason. Therefore, I partially agree with the statement so we can charge some price and also provide drinkable water to people.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you partially agree because clean water is essential, while purification can be costly. You address both the human-rights argument and the practical difficulty of providing water without charge, and the examples about water access in Africa and the cost of purification are relevant. However, the discussion of the opposing view is more developed than the explanation of how governments could ensure everyone still receives enough safe water if they charge for it. The Africa example is also broad and would be stronger with a specific detail or explanation. To develop the response further, clarify what “free” should mean in practice—for example, whether a basic household supply should be free while higher use is charged.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your position, two body paragraphs present the main arguments, and the conclusion restates your view. Linking expressions such as “In other words,” “Therefore,” and “As a result” help show relationships between ideas. However, some connections are mechanical or not fully logical. For example, the first body paragraph moves from water-related problems to the claim that people need water free of charge without explaining why charging would prevent access. The final paragraph repeats the central points rather than drawing them together. Improve progression by making each paragraph’s main claim explicit and ensuring each example directly supports it; use referencing and transitions more precisely to avoid repetition.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “fundamental right,” “purification process,” “drinkable water,” and “monetary reasons.” These choices make the subject clear, and you attempt more formal expressions such as “precious refined water resource.” Some wording is inaccurate or unnatural, however, including “diverse kind of issues,” “water that is clean,” and “charge some price on it to purchase.” There are also spelling errors, such as “surive” and “intesively,” which reduce accuracy. Aim for more natural collocations and avoid repeating “free of cost” and “clean water.” For instance, use “a range of health problems,” “safe drinking water,” and “charge households for their supply.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use both simple and complex sentence forms, including a reason clause in “I partially agree … because water is crucial” and a relative clause in “where many people does not have access.” Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. Subject–verb agreement is incorrect in “every human being need” and “many people does not”; the latter should be “many people do not.” The sentence beginning “Admittedly, purifying water…” joins clauses without suitable punctuation, and “some people may unable” needs “may be unable.” There are also problems with articles and sentence construction, as in “the government might charge some price on it to purchase.” Check agreement and modal verb patterns, and punctuate clauses carefully while retaining your attempts at complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.