Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Blessing of having a clean water for drinking and cooking is generally addressed as basic right of individuals. This basic right raises a demand of clean water, totally free of cost. I compelety disagree with the given notion, and this eassy will present an argument first, with supporitng relevant examples before drawing a final conclusion.

Clean water is a basic everday need for all living beings on the planet, and pollution plays core role in supply of fresh water. Increasing water pollution has infected water to the extend where citizens are frequently getting sick, and some even result in losing their lives. Allocating fresh water to all people in free of cost would be a tough challenge for government as well as economy of the nation. Water supply needs certain supplying methods. for instance, A well connected pipelines structure underground is built on the note of government. This is siginificantly expensive.

It is also worth noting that the procedure of cleaning water is not cheap at all, as advanced machines are required to filter gallons of water. These advancements require electricity, and power. Additionally, it also requires manpower to operate. To exemplify, the Muncipal corporations, are usually in charged for providing water supply to citizens which is a challenging task already, and invovles teamwork including night shits.

To conclude, it is generally not an easy task to provide clean, and fresh water to citizens as it invovles techonological merits for the desired benefit. It is also time consuming and expensive

because it requires cleaning of dirty contaminated water and turning it into safe drinkable water. This is a sensitive topic concerning human life. I firmly hold the view that this should not be free of charge.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction—“I completely disagree”—and remains consistent in the conclusion. You give relevant reasons, especially the costs of building pipelines, treating water, and operating supply systems, and the municipal-corporation example helps illustrate the practical demands. However, the response focuses mainly on why providing water is expensive; it does not fully examine the distinction between guaranteeing access to clean water and making every household’s supply entirely free. Some claims, such as pollution causing illness, are introduced but not developed with a specific explanation or example. To strengthen the response, address the human-rights aspect directly and explain how charges, subsidies, or targeted support could affect access while supporting your position with more developed examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting reasons, and a conclusion that restates your view. Ideas generally progress from pollution and infrastructure costs to the expense of treatment and staffing. Linking phrases such as “Additionally,” “To exemplify,” and “To conclude” help signal these stages. However, the introduction promises an argument “first” without clearly previewing the main points, and some connections between claims are abrupt—for example, the move from pollution-related illness to the government’s financial challenge. The conclusion also repeats the cost argument rather than synthesising the reasoning. Use clearer topic sentences and explain the relationship between each supporting point; vary transitions so the organisation feels less formulaic.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt vocabulary suited to the topic, including “basic right,” “water pollution,” “pipelines,” “filter,” and “contaminated water.” These choices make the subject clear, and some less common terms show an effort to be precise. However, inaccurate word choice and collocation are noticeable: “pollution … has infected water,” “on the note of government,” and “technological merits” do not express the intended meanings naturally. Spelling errors such as “compelety,” “eassy,” “siginificantly,” and “invovles” also reduce control. Build a more reliable range by learning common combinations such as “contaminate water,” “fund infrastructure,” and “water-treatment facilities,” and proofread spelling and word forms. This would make your argument more precise and fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use both simple and longer sentence forms, including the complex sentence beginning “Allocating fresh water to all people…” and the clause “as advanced machines are required to filter gallons of water.” This gives the response some structural variety, and the main meaning is generally understandable. However, errors in articles, agreement, sentence boundaries, and punctuation recur. For example, “a clean water” needs a different article pattern, “pollution plays core role” is missing an article, and “A well connected pipelines structure … is built” has agreement and number problems. The fragment-like “for instance” after a full stop and inconsistent capitalisation also affect accuracy. Practise checking each sentence for a clear subject and verb, correct singular/plural agreement, and appropriate punctuation, while retaining your attempts at complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.