Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

There is no doubt that access to clean water is human fundamental need. Accordingly each residence should possess a water container that is provided free of charge. I completely disagree with the given notion and following essay will present an argument first with relevant support, before drawing a reasonable conclusion.

First of all, in order to provide water supply, a clean water facility need to be builded. This is because basically water contains a considerable bacteria which can be harmfull if it consume directly by human. By filtering the water through clean water facility, it will diminish the bacteria which make it more safer to be consumed by human. For example, in palestine people use sea water as their primary source to provide clean water, however they do not directly consume the sea water, they build a huge water facility to clean the sea water, before after that it will be safer and clean to be consumed by the people in palestine. Consequently, they need to pay for water bills in order to access the clean water in their country.

Secondly, to run the clean water facility, it will require electric as their main energy resource. For instance, the every machinery in clean water facility rely on electric. Therefore to operate the machinery, the facility need to provides suficient electric. As a result, the facility will charged the electrical bills to residents.

To sum up, I disagree if every residence cannot be charged to have water supply, this is because to generate clean water there are need to be build such as water facility, the electrical energy to operate the water facility

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you disagree with free household water, and the discussion of treatment costs and electricity is relevant to that view. However, the response only partly develops the task. The first reason explains why water must be treated, but it does not fully establish why households should pay rather than have treatment funded publicly. The Palestine example is relevant, yet its connection to the general claim is asserted rather than explained. The second reason—that facilities use electricity—repeats the cost argument and needs more support, such as explaining how charges help maintain reliable supply. The conclusion also introduces an unclear claim about residents being unable to be charged. Develop the reasoning and state the final position consistently.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs signalled by “First of all” and “Secondly,” and a concluding paragraph. This makes the main line of argument reasonably easy to follow. Some linking is mechanical, however, and connections between claims are not always clear: “Consequently” moves from the Palestine example to water bills without explaining the relationship, while “As a result” similarly presents electricity costs as proof that residents should pay. The final paragraph is incomplete in its reasoning and does not clearly summarise the two points. Use transitions to show the precise logical relationship between ideas, and make the conclusion a complete, clear restatement of your position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “water supply,” “filtering,” “bacteria,” “facility,” and “electrical bills,” which helps communicate the subject. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “primary source” and “reasonable conclusion.” However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, sometimes making the meaning awkward: “water container” does not express a household water service, and “electric” is not the natural noun for the energy source. Spelling errors such as “harmfull” and “suficient” are noticeable. Aim for precise, natural combinations such as “water treatment plant,” “electricity costs,” and “treated water,” and check spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mixture of simple statements and longer sentences with subordinate clauses, for example, “This is because…” and “For example… however…”. However, control is inconsistent, and errors in sentence structure and verb forms sometimes make the reader work to understand the point. Examples include “a clean water facility need to be builded,” “if it consume,” and “the facility need to provides.” Articles, agreement, and sentence boundaries also need attention, as in “the every machinery” and the long example sentence joined with “however.” The conclusion is a fragment rather than a complete sentence. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement, passive forms, and complete sentence construction before adding more complex clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.