Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is important for every household to have sanitized water supplied to their doorway at no cost as ii is believed to be everyone's basic right.In my opinion, a charge should be applicable to maintain quality sustainability of supply although considerations should be made.

It is said that water is life and deserves to have access to it and in the safest condition.Providing it for free would help eradict water borne diseases such cholera in pandemic areas.For example in shant compounds with low economic status residents,water is drawn from weils and it is not purified before usage,this leads to diseases and sometimes death,free supply will help to prevent these deaths.

However, with the growing population globally, free water acess is seemingly impossible because even the people working in these departments needs to be paid at the end if the day and maintaince of pipes and water sanitizers comes with its own cost.For example, pipes need to be changed from time to time and supplies of these itesm need money and if water is provided freely, the mission of ckean water will be impossible.Therefore, local governments shiyld introduce Fair charges fir water and implement days ob which water will ve supplieed to residents,this will help with the cost and also promote clean water to ve made available for people of all social status.

In conclusion,water us life and everyone has the right to acess it in good and safe condition, therefore, a minimal charge should ve implementd to help continue suppling clean at all denands.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both the human-rights argument and the question of whether water should be free, and your position is that a modest charge is needed to sustain the service. The examples of untreated well water and the costs of replacing pipes support relevant points. However, the position is not fully consistent: the opening says charges should apply, while the first body paragraph strongly argues for free provision, and the conclusion does not explain how your compromise would protect access for poorer households. The proposal to provide water only on certain days is also introduced without enough explanation. Develop this balance more clearly—for example, distinguish a basic free allowance from charges for higher use—and explain how it would work.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the benefits and costs of free water, and a conclusion. The contrast signalled by “However” helps readers follow the shift to the opposing consideration, and examples are placed near the points they support. Some connections are less clear or mechanical, though. The first body paragraph moves from the general claim that water is life to disease prevention without a fully developed link, while the final proposal about supplying water on particular days appears abruptly. The conclusion repeats the general right to safe water but does not clearly bring together the two sides of your argument. Use clearer topic sentences and explain how each example leads to your proposed policy.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “water-borne diseases,” “maintain quality,” “pipes,” and “sanitized water,” and you attempt more specific terms such as “economic status.” This gives you enough range to discuss access and infrastructure. However, several spelling errors and inaccurate word choices make parts of the response harder to read, including “eradict,” “weils,” “acess,” and “ckean.” Some combinations are also unnatural, such as “supplied to their doorway” and “supplies of these items.” Choose familiar, accurate collocations rather than forcing less natural phrasing, and proofread spelling carefully. More precise terms such as “household water supply,” “water treatment,” and “maintenance costs” would make the argument clearer and more formal.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a conditional structure in “if water is provided freely, the mission … will be impossible,” and you use linking clauses to explain causes and consequences. Some grammatical errors remain, but the main argument is generally understandable. For example, “everyone … deserves to have access” needs a clear subject and verb structure, and “the people working in these departments needs” has a subject–verb agreement error. Several sentences also run together because punctuation is missing, as in the opening and the paragraph beginning “It is said that water is life.” Review agreement, sentence boundaries, and comma use, and make sure each sentence expresses one complete, clearly connected idea.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.