Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Every person has the right to use purified water. Many people cannot afford clean water because their budget does not allow them. For that reason, they usually use water from those supplies which charge lower fees. I think that everyone should have access to water without contamination. So it's a government responsibility that every home should have a water supply free of any charge.

Firstly, I think that every human has the right to use pure water weather he wants to use it for drinking,cleaning or for any other purpose. The first reason why I support this stance is the social welfare of the state. Many countries have made this a social right of the public. People have to

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response4.0
Coherence and Cohesion4.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You state a clear position in the opening: “everyone should have access to water without contamination” and that providing it is “a government responsibility.” You also begin to give a reason, referring to social welfare and countries that recognise water as a public right. However, the response addresses the question only minimally: it does not explain why every household’s supply should be free, rather than merely ensuring access to safe water, and the supporting point is left unfinished at “People have to”. The response is also substantially below the required 250 words, so there is not enough development or relevant example to support your view. Extend your reasoning with specific consequences, acknowledge costs or alternatives, and complete the essay with a conclusion.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The opening gives the reader a position, and “Firstly” signals the start of a supporting point, so there is some basic organisation. The ideas about affordability, safe water and government responsibility are related, but their connections are not fully explained; for example, the move from people choosing lower-fee supplies to the claim that all household water should be free needs a clearer link. The response stops mid-sentence, leaving the argument without a developed body or conclusion. To improve progression, organise the essay into an introduction, separate paragraphs for distinct reasons and a conclusion. Use linking expressions to show how each reason supports your position, rather than relying on a single signpost.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “purified water,” “without contamination,” “lower fees” and “social welfare.” These choices make the subject clear, and the meaning is generally understandable. However, some phrasing is imprecise or repetitive: “use pure water” and “access to water without contamination” express similar ideas, while “water supply free of any charge” could be stated more naturally and concisely. There is also a word-choice error in “weather” where “whether” is intended. Aim for precise collocations and vary repeated terms, for example by using “safe drinking water,” “public provision” or “water services,” where appropriate. Check spelling and word choice carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response includes both short statements and some longer structures, such as “Many people cannot afford clean water because their budget does not allow them” and “The first reason why I support this stance is the social welfare of the state.” These show an attempt to explain and justify your position, and the main meaning is usually clear. However, the range remains limited, and some sentence construction and punctuation need attention. In “every human has the right to use pure water weather he wants to use it,” the clause is awkwardly formed; a clearer structure would be “everyone has the right to use clean water, whether for drinking or cleaning.” Add a space after the comma in “drinking,cleaning,” and avoid leaving the final sentence incomplete. Practise accurate complex sentences and complete each thought.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.