Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Getting fresh and pure water is the basic human right of every human and peopel should get free of cost supply of water at their homes to have a good and healthy live. In my prespective, every human have a right to have a fresh and pure water for drinking and cooking purpose.

In the era of technology and science, there are many diseases due to contaminated water which are only the results of factories and industries which insert their waste directly into water without filtering them. Nowadays majority of the population is unable to get fresh and pure water to live a healthy life.

Government should make decisions to provide a supply of free water to every place of the country so people will get an enjoyful life and have a low risk of several diseases like kidney issues and lung problems. If Government will make such kinds of initiatives available to everyone for free then people will reduce their a lot of tensions and worries about the healthy future of their family espacially youngs and elders (children & people over 60 years)

In my opinion, having fresh and pure water is the basic human right and all the people should obligued with this facility to reduce the risk of serious diseases and to provide a healthy lifestyle.

To conclude, Administration should make steps to make the contaminated water pure and filtered, so all the citizens will get benifits from this facility and don't have to face a lot of difficulties to get a healthful life

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you support free household water because access to clean water protects health. You also give relevant reasons, including contamination from industrial waste and the risks to children and older people. However, the response only partly develops the task. It focuses mainly on why clean water is important, rather than examining the specific proposal that every home should receive its supply free of charge. For example, explain why charging households is unfair or how the government could fund free provision, and support this with a concrete example. The conclusion repeats the call for clean water but does not add a developed final reason. More direct discussion of the cost and responsibility involved would make your argument more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. Ideas about contamination, government action and health are grouped in a generally sensible order, and phrases such as “In my opinion” and “To conclude” help signal the stages of the argument. However, progression is limited because several points repeat the same claim that clean water is a right and prevents disease. Connections between claims also need to be clearer: the move from industrial pollution to free household supply does not explain how free provision would address contamination. Some sentences contain several ideas without clear links, particularly the sentence about reducing families’ worries. Develop each paragraph around one distinct reason and use linking phrases to show cause and effect.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “contaminated water,” “factories and industries,” “filtered,” and “serious diseases.” This gives the reader a basic understanding of your concerns. However, the range is limited and several phrases are repeated, especially “fresh and pure water,” “healthy life,” and “free.” Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “enjoyful life,” “reduce their a lot of tensions,” and “obligued with this facility.” Spelling errors such as “peopel,” “prespective,” “espacially,” and “benifits” also reduce accuracy. Aim for more precise expressions, such as “safe drinking water,” “ease financial pressure,” and “be entitled to this service,” and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentences, including a relative clause in “diseases … which are only the results of factories and industries” and a conditional sentence beginning “If Government will make…”. However, control is inconsistent, and errors in agreement, articles, verb forms and sentence construction sometimes make the meaning difficult to follow. For example, “every human have” should be “every person has,” while “If Government will make” needs a more suitable conditional form, such as “If the government makes.” The final sentence also shifts awkwardly between “should make steps” and “will get benefits.” Several long sentences would be clearer if divided and checked for one main clause. Practise accurate conditional structures and subject–verb agreement.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.