Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

One of the fundamental human rights is having the access to clean water. This is why some people argue that each house must have access to water without any fee, but I firmly disagree with this view, as it encourages irresponsible usage of water and places a burden on water supplying system.

The primary reason why I do not support this view is that it promotes the waste of water. This is mainly because having no fee will encourage people to use it uncontrollably, meaning without thinking of the dangers that this might have on water resources, as these resources are limited, therefore their consumption should also be limited. For instance, if every house, especially in a country that does not have huge water resources, consumes more than it needs, it would make the country run out of water. However, when the water is not free, people start thinking about managing water costs, so they begin to use it moderately. Therefore, charging houses to have water supply is mandatory to maintain a good usage behaviour.

Another compellig reason is that any excessive use of water is going to break down its supply system. In other terms, the government would be required to do tons of maintenance jobs and it might not be able to catch up with the intense rate of problems. As a result, the supply would be cut down constantly. Besides, fixing these issues would require a lot of money, and this money would most likely come from tax payers's pockets, thus it contradicts with the principle of free of charge water supply. Consequently, water cannot be free even if we wanted to.

In conclusion, although having access to clean waater is still a basic human right, I strongly believe that it should be charged for, as it will make people more careful and do not iterrupt the contineous supply of it.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you disagree with free household water, and the conclusion restates that view. You address the question with two relevant reasons—uncontrolled consumption and pressure on the supply system—and support them with explanations, including the example of a country with limited water resources. This gives the response a clear, sustained argument. To strengthen it further, develop the second reason more precisely: the link between free water, excessive use, system breakdown, and tax-funded repairs is asserted rather than demonstrated. You could also acknowledge that access as a human right may require affordable basic provision, then distinguish this from unlimited free use. That would make the argument more fully qualified and less generalised.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay is organised effectively into an introduction, two body paragraphs with distinct reasons, and a conclusion. The progression from water waste to infrastructure costs is easy to follow, and signposting such as “The primary reason,” “Another compelling reason,” and “In conclusion” helps readers navigate the argument. You also use cause-and-effect links, including “As a result” and “Consequently,” to connect claims. At times, however, these connectors are somewhat mechanical or repeat the same relationship, and the second body paragraph moves quickly from excessive use to system failure and taxpayer costs. Make that chain of reasoning more explicit, and use a few more varied transitions or clearer references between sentences to make cohesion feel more natural.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “water resources,” “consumption,” “maintenance,” and “supply system,” and you attempt more formal expressions such as “fundamental human rights” and “irresponsible usage.” Some choices are imprecise or unnatural, which limits the overall control: “water supplying system” would be more naturally expressed as “water supply system,” while “tons of maintenance jobs” is too informal for this essay. There are also spelling errors, including “compellig,” “waater,” “iterrupt,” and “contineous.” These do not prevent understanding, but careful proofreading and more precise collocations would improve clarity and academic tone. Aim to use familiar vocabulary accurately rather than forcing elaborate phrasing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including subordinate clauses and conditional reasoning, as in “if every house … consumes more than it needs, it would make the country run out of water.” Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “having the access” uses an unnecessary article, and “it contradicts with the principle” has an incorrect preposition pattern. In the conclusion, “it will make people more careful and do not interrupt” does not maintain parallel verb forms; use “make people more careful and prevent interruptions.” The sentence beginning “This is mainly because” also becomes overloaded with several linked clauses. Break long sentences into clearer units and check articles, verb forms, and clause boundaries.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.