Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Human being cannot survive without water. It is a basic need which is required not only for human body, but also for daily chores like cleaning, cooking, industrial use etc. I agree with the fact that goverment should ensure the access of clean water for its people. However, I do not support the claim that goverment should make water supply free of charge. The essay will discuss the reasons behind it.

The main reason is that there are a lot of expenses associated with supplying water. For example, fixed costs like water purifying facilities, machines and equipments, pipes being installed all over the city etc., and variable costs like electricity bill, equipment maintenance bill, purifying chemical costs etc. If all are combined, it would be a huge cost for government to bear. Government runs country on tax's money that is given by the citizen of the country which is used for country's basic needs and developments. The development of a country will get slow if a large portion of its money go to its water supply.

Another reason is that people tend to waste things that they get for free of cost. People will not value the importance of water once they start getting it for free. For example, getting water supply without cost will make them think that water is unlimited which is why government is giving it without taking any money.

In conclusion, getting water for free of charge will make people take it for granted. Hence, water supply should not be given for free. All goverment can do is that they can implement a system that would charge people based on the amount of water they use. That is the only way a goverment could be kind and fair to its public.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear throughout: you support access to clean water but disagree that household supply should be free. You address the question with two relevant reasons—public costs and the risk of waste—and give a practical alternative in the conclusion, charging according to use. These points make the response relevant and complete overall. However, the cost argument is explained mainly through lists of expenses, and the claim that national development would slow is asserted rather than illustrated or developed. The point about people wasting free water would also benefit from a specific example or explanation of how pricing could prevent this while protecting basic access. More balanced development of these ideas would make the response more convincing and complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, each body paragraph presents a separate reason, and the conclusion restates your position and proposes a charging system. The progression is easy to follow, and signposts such as “The main reason,” “Another reason,” and “In conclusion” help the reader navigate the argument. At times, however, cohesion relies on predictable transitions rather than links that show the precise relationship between ideas. The long list of fixed and variable costs could be organised more clearly, and the connection between taxation, water expenditure, and slower development needs a fuller explanation. Develop each paragraph through a claim, explanation, and example, and use referencing or linking phrases to connect those steps more naturally.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate your argument, including “water purifying facilities,” “variable costs,” “maintenance,” and “amount of water they use.” There are also attempts at more specific language, such as distinguishing fixed from variable expenses. However, several noticeable word-choice, spelling, and collocation problems limit precision: “goverment” is repeatedly misspelled, “equipments” is not the appropriate form here, and “free of cost” and “tax’s money” are awkward expressions. Some wording is also vague or repetitive, particularly “things” and repeated references to “free.” Aim for accurate collocations and a broader range of terms for water provision, public expenditure, and conservation; this will make the argument sound more precise and natural.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use a mixture of simple and more complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “which is required” and a conditional structure in “if they start getting it for free.” Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “Human being cannot survive” needs a plural or determiner, and “a large portion of its money go” has a subject–verb agreement error. The sentence beginning “For example, fixed costs…” is a fragment rather than a complete sentence, while “All goverment can do is that they can implement” has an awkward and unnecessarily repeated structure. Work on agreement, articles, complete sentence construction, and more controlled complex clauses to improve accuracy while retaining variety.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.