Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-07-27
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
It is often argued that Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge has become a major issue in modern society, and people have different opinions about it.
In my opinion, I strongly agree with this statement because it has more positive effects on society.
To begin with, One of the main reasons behind this is that every people have a right to access to clean water to free of charge, which plays a significant role in this situation.
This mean that people to used fresh waster for their daily life it is their primary need.
For example, in many countries people are already experiencing this situation in their routine activities. Therefore, it is clear that this factory strongly supports the given opinion.
Another important point to consider is that for their survival purpose, which also contributes to this issue in a meaningful way.
In other words every people wont to water for their body to came and stay active, due to without water they not work properly. For instance many people nowadays work on so many hours they forrgot to drink water and they feal de hidration and they emergency admit in hospital doctor give them glucouz bota. As a result, it becomes evident that this trend is beneficial.
In conclusion, although some people believe that water supply that is provided free of charge, I strongly believe that I am agree with this statement because it is more practical and realistic.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position in favor of free water. However, the development of ideas is limited and repetitive. The arguments provided, such as 'survival purpose' and 'daily life', are underdeveloped and lack specific, logical support. The examples provided, such as the mention of 'glucouz bota' (glucose bottles) and hospital admissions, are somewhat tangential and do not effectively support the economic or social argument for free water. To improve, you should focus on providing more logical, well-reasoned arguments, such as the public health benefits or the economic impact on low-income families, rather than anecdotal or unclear examples.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the progression of ideas is often unclear. While some cohesive devices are used (e.g., 'To begin with', 'In conclusion'), they are often used mechanically or incorrectly. The referencing is frequently confusing, such as in the second paragraph where the connection between working long hours and the need for free water is not logically linked. The flow between sentences is often disjointed, making it difficult for the reader to follow the argument. Improving the use of linking words and ensuring each paragraph has a clear, singular focus would significantly enhance the coherence of your writing.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is limited and often inaccurate, which occasionally impedes communication. There are several instances of incorrect word choice and spelling errors, such as 'every people' (should be 'everyone'), 'wont to water' (likely 'want water'), 'feal' (feel), 'de hidration' (dehydration), and 'glucouz bota' (glucose bottle). These errors suggest a lack of control over basic collocations and spelling. To reach a higher band, you need to expand your range of vocabulary and focus on using words accurately in context. Avoid informal or non-standard phrasing and aim for more precise terminology related to the topic of human rights and public policy.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay relies heavily on simple sentence structures, and there are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text. Issues include subject-verb agreement ('every people have'), incorrect preposition usage ('access to clean water to free of charge'), and awkward sentence construction ('This mean that people to used fresh waster'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, and the lack of complex structures limits the range. To improve, focus on mastering basic sentence patterns, ensuring correct verb tenses, and practicing the use of complex sentences with subordinate clauses. Proofreading for basic errors like 'I am agree' (should be 'I agree') is essential.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.