Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-07-27
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Acess to clean water is a basic human right because without water it is imposible for any living thing to live. so, government has a responsibility to supply clean water in every home. I agree with this notion. Water is a important source of life in many countries many people died due to polluted water. For Example in pakistan there many areas where clean water is no available for drinking and household uses so every year many people caused by different diseases. Mainly, in karachi people are suffring many diseases due to polluted water. This is not only in pakistan also other countries e.g, in India, Nepal and Srilanka. So, clean water is supply to every home for healthy life. In Europe clean water is supplied to every home
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response fails to meet the minimum word count requirement of 250 words, reaching only 129 words. This significantly impacts the development of ideas. While the student clearly states their position in the introduction, the arguments are underdeveloped and lack the necessary depth and supporting evidence required for an academic essay. The examples provided (Pakistan, India, etc.) are relevant but are presented in a fragmented manner without sufficient analysis to support the claim that water should be free. Because the response is severely under-length, it cannot fully address all parts of the task in the depth required for a higher band score.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay lacks a clear structure. There is no logical paragraphing, and the text appears as a series of loosely connected sentences. Cohesive devices are either missing or used incorrectly, such as the repetitive use of 'so' and the lack of transition between the introduction and the body. The progression of ideas is disjointed, making it difficult for the reader to follow the argument. To improve, the student should focus on using clear topic sentences for each paragraph and employing a wider range of linking words like 'furthermore', 'consequently', or 'in contrast' to connect ideas logically.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is basic and repetitive, which limits the ability to express complex ideas. There are several spelling errors, such as 'Acess', 'imposible', 'srilanka', and 'suffring'. The range of vocabulary is insufficient for an academic task, relying on simple terms like 'important source' and 'healthy life'. While the meaning is generally conveyed, the lack of precision and the frequent spelling mistakes hinder the overall quality of the writing. The student needs to expand their vocabulary to include more academic collocations and ensure accurate spelling of proper nouns and common terms.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The response contains frequent grammatical errors that affect readability. There are issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'clean water is supply'), article usage (e.g., 'in every home'), and sentence structure (e.g., 'many people caused by different diseases'). The essay relies almost exclusively on simple sentence structures, with very few attempts at complex sentences. Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with the use of commas and capitalization. To improve, the student should focus on mastering basic sentence construction, subject-verb agreement, and the correct use of articles before attempting more complex grammatical structures.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.