Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-07-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is often argued that clean water is an important need for everyone and should be supplied to households free of cost. I strongly agree with this statement because this is a key to survive and providing it free of charges can protect vulnerable people and improve public health.

To commence with, suppling clean water should be free because it is essential for human survival. People cannot live without water and charging for basic water needs can affect poor families. For example, low income households may struggle to pay water bills and may reduce their water usage.

Moreover, free water supply can improve public health. Everyone having access to clean water reduces diseases caused by unsafe water. To examplify, developing countries can reduce illness by providing safe drinking water to all citizens

To conclude, this is important thing to supply clean water to the city that will be great help for families who can not afford cost to pay for water.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position, but it fails to meet the minimum word count requirement of 250 words. At only 161 words, the development of ideas is significantly restricted. While the arguments regarding survival and public health are relevant, they are presented in a very brief, superficial manner without sufficient elaboration or concrete examples. To achieve a higher band, you must expand your arguments with more detailed explanations, counter-arguments, or specific real-world scenarios to reach the required length and demonstrate a deeper exploration of the topic.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, which helps the reader follow your argument. You use basic cohesive devices such as 'To commence with', 'Moreover', and 'To conclude' to signal the transition between ideas. However, the progression of ideas is somewhat repetitive, and the links between sentences are occasionally mechanical. To improve, try to vary your cohesive devices and ensure that each paragraph contains a more robust development of the central idea, rather than just a few short sentences. The overall structure is clear, but the lack of depth limits the flow.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

Your vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but it is quite limited and repetitive. Phrases like 'important need', 'free of cost', and 'basic water needs' are used, but there is little attempt to use more sophisticated or academic vocabulary. There are also minor errors in word choice, such as 'suppling' (supplying) and 'examplify' (exemplify). To improve, you should aim to incorporate a wider range of topic-specific vocabulary related to public policy, economics, or social welfare, and ensure that you use these words with greater precision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and some complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are several grammatical errors, such as 'key to survive' (key to survival), 'free of charges' (free of charge), and 'important thing to supply' (important to supply). Punctuation is generally acceptable, but the range of structures is limited. To reach a higher band, you need to demonstrate more control over complex sentence forms and reduce the frequency of basic grammatical slips. Focus on subject-verb agreement and correct word forms.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.